From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
Cc: "eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"jgg@nvidia.com" <jgg@nvidia.com>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"cohuck@redhat.com" <cohuck@redhat.com>,
"nicolinc@nvidia.com" <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"mjrosato@linux.ibm.com" <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>,
"chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com" <chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>,
"yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com" <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>,
"peterx@redhat.com" <peterx@redhat.com>,
"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com"
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
"lulu@redhat.com" <lulu@redhat.com>,
"suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com" <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
"intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
"Hao, Xudong" <xudong.hao@intel.com>,
"Zhao, Yan Y" <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
"Xu, Terrence" <terrence.xu@intel.com>,
"Jiang, Yanting" <yanting.jiang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 25/25] docs: vfio: Add vfio device cdev description
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2023 10:58:28 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230405105828.6d170cec.alex.williamson@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DS0PR11MB752960F2A336E30ACA9E9ECEC3909@DS0PR11MB7529.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Wed, 5 Apr 2023 14:00:00 +0000
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> > From: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 5, 2023 9:46 PM
> >
> > Hi Yi,
> >
> > On 4/1/23 17:18, Yi Liu wrote:
> > > This gives notes for userspace applications on device cdev usage.
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 1 file changed, 132 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
> > > index 363e12c90b87..4f21be7bda8a 100644
> > > --- a/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
> > > +++ b/Documentation/driver-api/vfio.rst
> > > @@ -239,6 +239,130 @@ group and can access them as follows::
> > > /* Gratuitous device reset and go... */
> > > ioctl(device, VFIO_DEVICE_RESET);
> > >
> > > +IOMMUFD and vfio_iommu_type1
> > > +----------------------------
> > > +
> > > +IOMMUFD is the new user API to manage I/O page tables from userspace.
> > > +It intends to be the portal of delivering advanced userspace DMA
> > > +features (nested translation [5], PASID [6], etc.) while also providing
> > > +a backwards compatibility interface for existing VFIO_TYPE1v2_IOMMU use
> > > +cases. Eventually the vfio_iommu_type1 driver, as well as the legacy
> > > +vfio container and group model is intended to be deprecated.
> > > +
> > > +The IOMMUFD backwards compatibility interface can be enabled two ways.
> > > +In the first method, the kernel can be configured with
> > > +CONFIG_IOMMUFD_VFIO_CONTAINER, in which case the IOMMUFD subsystem
> > > +transparently provides the entire infrastructure for the VFIO
> > > +container and IOMMU backend interfaces. The compatibility mode can
> > > +also be accessed if the VFIO container interface, ie. /dev/vfio/vfio is
> > > +simply symlink'd to /dev/iommu. Note that at the time of writing, the
> > > +compatibility mode is not entirely feature complete relative to
> > > +VFIO_TYPE1v2_IOMMU (ex. DMA mapping MMIO) and does not attempt to
> > > +provide compatibility to the VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU interface. Therefore
> > > +it is not generally advisable at this time to switch from native VFIO
> > > +implementations to the IOMMUFD compatibility interfaces.
> > > +
> > > +Long term, VFIO users should migrate to device access through the cdev
> > > +interface described below, and native access through the IOMMUFD
> > > +provided interfaces.
> > > +
> > > +VFIO Device cdev
> > > +----------------
> > > +
> > > +Traditionally user acquires a device fd via VFIO_GROUP_GET_DEVICE_FD
> > > +in a VFIO group.
> > > +
> > > +With CONFIG_VFIO_DEVICE_CDEV=y the user can now acquire a device fd
> > > +by directly opening a character device /dev/vfio/devices/vfioX where
> > > +"X" is the number allocated uniquely by VFIO for registered devices.
> > > +For noiommu devices, the character device would be named with "noiommu-"
> > > +prefix. e.g. /dev/vfio/devices/noiommu-vfioX.
> > > +
> > > +The cdev only works with IOMMUFD. Both VFIO drivers and applications
> > > +must adapt to the new cdev security model which requires using
> > > +VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD to claim DMA ownership before starting to
> > > +actually use the device. Once BIND succeeds then a VFIO device can
> > > +be fully accessed by the user.
> > > +
> > > +VFIO device cdev doesn't rely on VFIO group/container/iommu drivers.
> > > +Hence those modules can be fully compiled out in an environment
> > > +where no legacy VFIO application exists.
> > > +
> > > +So far SPAPR does not support IOMMUFD yet. So it cannot support device
> > > +cdev neither.
> > > +
> > > +Device cdev Example
> > > +-------------------
> > > +
> > > +Assume user wants to access PCI device 0000:6a:01.0::
> > > +
> > > + $ ls /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:6a:01.0/vfio-dev/
> > > + vfio0
> > > +
> > > +This device is therefore represented as vfio0. The user can verify
> > > +its existence::
> > > +
> > > + $ ls -l /dev/vfio/devices/vfio0
> > > + crw------- 1 root root 511, 0 Feb 16 01:22 /dev/vfio/devices/vfio0
> > > + $ cat /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000:6a:01.0/vfio-dev/vfio0/dev
> > you mentionned in the pci hot reset series that the BDF couldn't be used
> > if cdev is being used. According to the above, it could, no?
>
> It should be the device passing case, otherwise, BDF can be used. But
> from kernel p.o.v., it has no idea how user gets the device fd, so it needs
> to assume user may not have BDF knowledge.
>
> > > + 511:0
> > > + $ ls -l /dev/char/511\:0
> > > + lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 21 Feb 16 01:22 /dev/char/511:0 -
> > > ../vfio/devices/vfio0
> > > +
> > > +Then provide the user with access to the device if unprivileged
> > > +operation is desired::
> > > +
> > > + $ chown user:user /dev/vfio/devices/vfio0
> > > +
> > > +Finally the user could get cdev fd by::
> > > +
> > > + cdev_fd = open("/dev/vfio/devices/vfio0", O_RDWR);
> > > +
> > > +An opened cdev_fd doesn't give the user any permission of accessing
> > > +the device except binding the cdev_fd to an iommufd. After that point
> > > +then the device is fully accessible including attaching it to an
> > > +IOMMUFD IOAS/HWPT to enable userspace DMA::
> > > +
> > > + struct vfio_device_bind_iommufd bind = {
> > > + .argsz = sizeof(bind),
> > > + .flags = 0,
> > > + };
> > > + struct iommu_ioas_alloc alloc_data = {
> > > + .size = sizeof(alloc_data),
> > > + .flags = 0,
> > > + };
> > > + struct vfio_device_attach_iommufd_pt attach_data = {
> > > + .argsz = sizeof(attach_data),
> > > + .flags = 0,
> > > + };
> > > + struct iommu_ioas_map map = {
> > > + .size = sizeof(map),
> > > + .flags = IOMMU_IOAS_MAP_READABLE |
> > > + IOMMU_IOAS_MAP_WRITEABLE |
> > > + IOMMU_IOAS_MAP_FIXED_IOVA,
> > > + .__reserved = 0,
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + iommufd = open("/dev/iommu", O_RDWR);
> > > +
> > > + bind.iommufd = iommufd; // negative value means vfio-noiommu mode
> > > + ioctl(cdev_fd, VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD, &bind);
> > > +
> > > + ioctl(iommufd, IOMMU_IOAS_ALLOC, &alloc_data);
> > > + attach_data.pt_id = alloc_data.out_ioas_id;
> > > + ioctl(cdev_fd, VFIO_DEVICE_ATTACH_IOMMUFD_PT, &attach_data);
> > > +
> > > + /* Allocate some space and setup a DMA mapping */
> > > + map.user_va = (int64_t)mmap(0, 1024 * 1024, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> > > + MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, 0, 0);
> > > + map.iova = 0; /* 1MB starting at 0x0 from device view */
> > > + map.length = 1024 * 1024;
> > > + map.ioas_id = alloc_data.out_ioas_id;;
> > > +
> > > + ioctl(iommufd, IOMMU_IOAS_MAP, &map);
> > > +
> > > + /* Other device operations as stated in "VFIO Usage Example" */
> > dev_id is not mentioned anywhere whereas it is used in the reset get
> > info. Worth to be mentioned?
>
> a good point. but it is just for PCI devices, not sure if it is good to
> mention it here. or the kdoc in the HOT_RESET_INFO ioctl is already
> enough. Alex, how about your taste?.
dev-id is just for PCI devices?? Maybe it's only a vfio-pci ioctl
that's requiring it for input, but it's not a bus specific feature.
There should be a description of how an iommufd property of the device
maps to this subsystem. Thanks,
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-05 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-01 15:18 [PATCH v9 00/25] Add vfio_device cdev for iommufd support Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 01/25] vfio: Allocate per device file structure Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 02/25] vfio: Refine vfio file kAPIs for KVM Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 03/25] vfio: Remove vfio_file_is_group() Yi Liu
2023-04-05 12:20 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 04/25] vfio: Accept vfio device file in the KVM facing kAPI Yi Liu
2023-04-05 17:58 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 05/25] kvm/vfio: Rename kvm_vfio_group to prepare for accepting vfio device fd Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 06/25] kvm/vfio: Accept vfio device file from userspace Yi Liu
2023-04-06 9:46 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-06 10:49 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-04-06 18:57 ` Alex Williamson
2023-04-07 3:42 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-04-07 8:56 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-07 10:23 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 07/25] vfio: Pass struct vfio_device_file * to vfio_device_open/close() Yi Liu
2023-04-06 12:43 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 08/25] vfio: Block device access via device fd until device is opened Yi Liu
2023-04-06 14:08 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 09/25] vfio: Add cdev_device_open_cnt to vfio_group Yi Liu
2023-04-06 14:13 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 10/25] vfio: Make vfio_device_open() single open for device cdev path Yi Liu
2023-04-06 16:44 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-07 9:48 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-07 10:18 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 11/25] vfio: Make vfio_device_first_open() to accept NULL iommufd for noiommu Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 12/25] vfio-iommufd: Move noiommu support out of vfio_iommufd_bind() Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 13/25] vfio-iommufd: Split bind/attach into two steps Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 14/25] vfio: Record devid in vfio_device_file Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 15/25] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for physical VFIO devices Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 16/25] iommufd/device: Add iommufd_access_detach() API Yi Liu
2023-04-04 22:45 ` Alex Williamson
2023-04-05 11:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-04-05 14:10 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-04-05 14:28 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-04-05 14:46 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 17/25] vfio-iommufd: Add detach_ioas support for emulated VFIO devices Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 18/25] vfio: Determine noiommu in vfio_device registration Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 19/25] vfio: Name noiommu vfio_device with "noiommu-" prefix Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 20/25] vfio: Move vfio_device_group_unregister() to be the first operation in unregister Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 21/25] vfio: Add cdev for vfio_device Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 22/25] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 23/25] vfio: Add VFIO_DEVICE_[AT|DE]TACH_IOMMUFD_PT Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 24/25] vfio: Compile group optionally Yi Liu
2023-04-01 15:18 ` [PATCH v9 25/25] docs: vfio: Add vfio device cdev description Yi Liu
2023-04-05 13:45 ` Eric Auger
2023-04-05 14:00 ` Liu, Yi L
2023-04-05 16:58 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2023-04-07 8:44 ` Liu, Yi L
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230405105828.6d170cec.alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lulu@redhat.com \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=terrence.xu@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yanting.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
--cc=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox