From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x/snippets: Fix compilation with Clang 15
Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:31:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230404123155.728e3f2e@p-imbrenda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230404101434.172721-1-thuth@redhat.com>
On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 12:14:34 +0200
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> Clang complains:
>
> s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S:22:13: error: invalid operand for instruction
> lghi %r15, stackptr
> ^
> Let's load the address with "larl" instead, like we already do
> it in s390x/cstart64.S. For this we should also switch to 64-bit
> mode first, then we also don't have to clear r15 right in front
> of this anymore.
>
> Changing the code here triggered another problem: initial_cr0
> must be aligned on a double-word boundary, otherwise the lctlg
> instruction will fail with an specification exception. This was
> just working by accident so far - add an ".align 8" now to avoid
> the problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S | 7 ++++---
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S b/s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S
> index a7d4cd42..c80ccfed 100644
> --- a/s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S
> +++ b/s390x/snippets/c/cstart.S
> @@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ start:
> larl %r1, initial_cr0
> lctlg %c0, %c0, 0(%r1)
> /* XOR all registers with themselves to clear them fully. */
> - .irp i, 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15
> + .irp i, 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14
> xgr \i,\i
> .endr
> - /* 0x3000 is the stack page for now */
> - lghi %r15, stackptr
> sam64
> + /* 0x3000 is the stack page for now */
> + larl %r15, stackptr
> brasl %r14, main
> /*
> * If main() returns, we stop the CPU with the code below. We also
> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ exit:
> xgr %r0, %r0
> sigp %r2, %r0, SIGP_STOP
>
> + .align 8
> initial_cr0:
> /* enable AFP-register control, so FP regs (+BFP instr) can be used */
> .quad 0x0000000000040000
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-04 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-04 10:14 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH] s390x/snippets: Fix compilation with Clang 15 Thomas Huth
2023-04-04 10:31 ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2023-04-04 11:21 ` Janosch Frank
2023-04-04 11:40 ` Nico Boehr
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230404123155.728e3f2e@p-imbrenda \
--to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox