public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
To: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
	david@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] KVM: s390: add stat counter for shadow gmap events
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 15:20:09 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231009152009.2102a545@p-imbrenda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231009093304.2555344-2-nrb@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon,  9 Oct 2023 11:32:52 +0200
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> The shadow gmap tracks memory of nested guests (guest-3). In certain
> scenarios, the shadow gmap needs to be rebuilt, which is a costly operation
> since it involves a SIE exit into guest-1 for every entry in the respective
> shadow level.
> 
> Add kvm stat counters when new shadow structures are created at various
> levels. Also add a counter gmap_shadow_create when a completely fresh
> shadow gmap is created as well as a counter gmap_shadow_reuse when an
> existing gmap is being reused.
> 
> Note that when several levels are shadowed at once, counters on all
> affected levels will be increased.
> 
> Also note that not all page table levels need to be present and a ASCE
> can directly point to e.g. a segment table. In this case, a new segment
> table will always be equivalent to a new shadow gmap and hence will be
> counted as gmap_shadow_create and not as gmap_shadow_segment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>

> ---
>  arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 7 +++++++
>  arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c          | 7 +++++++
>  arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c         | 9 ++++++++-
>  arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c             | 5 ++++-
>  4 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 427f9528a7b6..67a298b6cf6e 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -777,6 +777,13 @@ struct kvm_vm_stat {
>  	u64 inject_service_signal;
>  	u64 inject_virtio;
>  	u64 aen_forward;
> +	u64 gmap_shadow_create;
> +	u64 gmap_shadow_reuse;
> +	u64 gmap_shadow_r1_entry;
> +	u64 gmap_shadow_r2_entry;
> +	u64 gmap_shadow_r3_entry;
> +	u64 gmap_shadow_sg_entry;
> +	u64 gmap_shadow_pg_entry;
>  };
>  
>  struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> index 6d6bc19b37dc..ff8349d17b33 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/gaccess.c
> @@ -1382,6 +1382,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long saddr,
>  				  unsigned long *pgt, int *dat_protection,
>  				  int *fake)
>  {
> +	struct kvm *kvm;
>  	struct gmap *parent;
>  	union asce asce;
>  	union vaddress vaddr;
> @@ -1390,6 +1391,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long saddr,
>  
>  	*fake = 0;
>  	*dat_protection = 0;
> +	kvm = sg->private;
>  	parent = sg->parent;
>  	vaddr.addr = saddr;
>  	asce.val = sg->orig_asce;
> @@ -1450,6 +1452,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long saddr,
>  		rc = gmap_shadow_r2t(sg, saddr, rfte.val, *fake);
>  		if (rc)
>  			return rc;
> +		kvm->stat.gmap_shadow_r1_entry++;
>  	}
>  		fallthrough;
>  	case ASCE_TYPE_REGION2: {
> @@ -1478,6 +1481,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long saddr,
>  		rc = gmap_shadow_r3t(sg, saddr, rste.val, *fake);
>  		if (rc)
>  			return rc;
> +		kvm->stat.gmap_shadow_r2_entry++;
>  	}
>  		fallthrough;
>  	case ASCE_TYPE_REGION3: {
> @@ -1515,6 +1519,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long saddr,
>  		rc = gmap_shadow_sgt(sg, saddr, rtte.val, *fake);
>  		if (rc)
>  			return rc;
> +		kvm->stat.gmap_shadow_r3_entry++;
>  	}
>  		fallthrough;
>  	case ASCE_TYPE_SEGMENT: {
> @@ -1548,6 +1553,7 @@ static int kvm_s390_shadow_tables(struct gmap *sg, unsigned long saddr,
>  		rc = gmap_shadow_pgt(sg, saddr, ste.val, *fake);
>  		if (rc)
>  			return rc;
> +		kvm->stat.gmap_shadow_sg_entry++;
>  	}
>  	}
>  	/* Return the parent address of the page table */
> @@ -1618,6 +1624,7 @@ int kvm_s390_shadow_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct gmap *sg,
>  	pte.p |= dat_protection;
>  	if (!rc)
>  		rc = gmap_shadow_page(sg, saddr, __pte(pte.val));
> +	vcpu->kvm->stat.gmap_shadow_pg_entry++;
>  	ipte_unlock(vcpu->kvm);
>  	mmap_read_unlock(sg->mm);
>  	return rc;
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index b3f17e014cab..b42493110d76 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -66,7 +66,14 @@ const struct _kvm_stats_desc kvm_vm_stats_desc[] = {
>  	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, inject_pfault_done),
>  	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, inject_service_signal),
>  	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, inject_virtio),
> -	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, aen_forward)
> +	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, aen_forward),
> +	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, gmap_shadow_reuse),
> +	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, gmap_shadow_create),
> +	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, gmap_shadow_r1_entry),
> +	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, gmap_shadow_r2_entry),
> +	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, gmap_shadow_r3_entry),
> +	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, gmap_shadow_sg_entry),
> +	STATS_DESC_COUNTER(VM, gmap_shadow_pg_entry),
>  };
>  
>  const struct kvm_stats_header kvm_vm_stats_header = {
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> index 61499293c2ac..02dcbe82a8e5 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/vsie.c
> @@ -1214,8 +1214,10 @@ static int acquire_gmap_shadow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	 * we're holding has been unshadowed. If the gmap is still valid,
>  	 * we can safely reuse it.
>  	 */
> -	if (vsie_page->gmap && gmap_shadow_valid(vsie_page->gmap, asce, edat))
> +	if (vsie_page->gmap && gmap_shadow_valid(vsie_page->gmap, asce, edat)) {
> +		vcpu->kvm->stat.gmap_shadow_reuse++;
>  		return 0;
> +	}
>  
>  	/* release the old shadow - if any, and mark the prefix as unmapped */
>  	release_gmap_shadow(vsie_page);
> @@ -1223,6 +1225,7 @@ static int acquire_gmap_shadow(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	if (IS_ERR(gmap))
>  		return PTR_ERR(gmap);
>  	gmap->private = vcpu->kvm;
> +	vcpu->kvm->stat.gmap_shadow_create++;
>  	WRITE_ONCE(vsie_page->gmap, gmap);
>  	return 0;
>  }


  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-09 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-09  9:32 [PATCH v4 0/2] KVM: s390: add counters for vsie performance Nico Boehr
2023-10-09  9:32 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] KVM: s390: add stat counter for shadow gmap events Nico Boehr
2023-10-09 13:20   ` Claudio Imbrenda [this message]
2023-10-09 13:31   ` Janosch Frank
2023-10-09  9:32 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] KVM: s390: add tracepoint in gmap notifier Nico Boehr
2023-10-09 13:20   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2023-10-09 13:32   ` Janosch Frank

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20231009152009.2102a545@p-imbrenda \
    --to=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox