public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 01/11] arch: consolidate arch_irq_work_raise prototypes
@ 2024-01-16  1:07 Sasha Levin
  2024-01-16  1:07 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 03/11] s390/ptrace: handle setting of fpc register correctly Sasha Levin
  2024-01-16  1:07 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 04/11] KVM: s390: fix setting of fpc register Sasha Levin
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2024-01-16  1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, stable
  Cc: Arnd Bergmann, Alexander Gordeev, Catalin Marinas, Palmer Dabbelt,
	Guo Ren, Sasha Levin, will, mpe, paul.walmsley, palmer, aou, hca,
	gor, tglx, mingo, bp, dave.hansen, x86, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-csky, linuxppc-dev, linux-riscv, linux-s390

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

[ Upstream commit 64bac5ea17d527872121adddfee869c7a0618f8f ]

The prototype was hidden in an #ifdef on x86, which causes a warning:

kernel/irq_work.c:72:13: error: no previous prototype for 'arch_irq_work_raise' [-Werror=missing-prototypes]

Some architectures have a working prototype, while others don't.
Fix this by providing it in only one place that is always visible.

Reviewed-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
Acked-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h   | 2 --
 arch/csky/include/asm/irq_work.h    | 2 +-
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq_work.h | 1 -
 arch/riscv/include/asm/irq_work.h   | 2 +-
 arch/s390/include/asm/irq_work.h    | 2 --
 arch/x86/include/asm/irq_work.h     | 1 -
 include/linux/irq_work.h            | 3 +++
 7 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h
index 81bbfa3a035b..a1020285ea75 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/irq_work.h
@@ -2,8 +2,6 @@
 #ifndef __ASM_IRQ_WORK_H
 #define __ASM_IRQ_WORK_H
 
-extern void arch_irq_work_raise(void);
-
 static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
 {
 	return true;
diff --git a/arch/csky/include/asm/irq_work.h b/arch/csky/include/asm/irq_work.h
index 33aaf39d6f94..d39fcc1f5395 100644
--- a/arch/csky/include/asm/irq_work.h
+++ b/arch/csky/include/asm/irq_work.h
@@ -7,5 +7,5 @@ static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
 {
 	return true;
 }
-extern void arch_irq_work_raise(void);
+
 #endif /* __ASM_CSKY_IRQ_WORK_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq_work.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq_work.h
index b8b0be8f1a07..c6d3078bd8c3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq_work.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/irq_work.h
@@ -6,6 +6,5 @@ static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
 {
 	return true;
 }
-extern void arch_irq_work_raise(void);
 
 #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_IRQ_WORK_H */
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq_work.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq_work.h
index b53891964ae0..b27a4d64fc6a 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq_work.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/irq_work.h
@@ -6,5 +6,5 @@ static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
 {
 	return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP);
 }
-extern void arch_irq_work_raise(void);
+
 #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_IRQ_WORK_H */
diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/irq_work.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/irq_work.h
index 603783766d0a..f00c9f610d5a 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/irq_work.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/irq_work.h
@@ -7,6 +7,4 @@ static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
 	return true;
 }
 
-void arch_irq_work_raise(void);
-
 #endif /* _ASM_S390_IRQ_WORK_H */
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_work.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_work.h
index 800ffce0db29..6b4d36c95165 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_work.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_work.h
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
 {
 	return boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APIC);
 }
-extern void arch_irq_work_raise(void);
 #else
 static inline bool arch_irq_work_has_interrupt(void)
 {
diff --git a/include/linux/irq_work.h b/include/linux/irq_work.h
index ec2a47a81e42..ee5f9120c4d7 100644
--- a/include/linux/irq_work.h
+++ b/include/linux/irq_work.h
@@ -58,6 +58,9 @@ void irq_work_sync(struct irq_work *work);
 void irq_work_run(void);
 bool irq_work_needs_cpu(void);
 void irq_work_single(void *arg);
+
+void arch_irq_work_raise(void);
+
 #else
 static inline bool irq_work_needs_cpu(void) { return false; }
 static inline void irq_work_run(void) { }
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 03/11] s390/ptrace: handle setting of fpc register correctly
  2024-01-16  1:07 [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 01/11] arch: consolidate arch_irq_work_raise prototypes Sasha Levin
@ 2024-01-16  1:07 ` Sasha Levin
  2024-01-16  1:07 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 04/11] KVM: s390: fix setting of fpc register Sasha Levin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2024-01-16  1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, stable
  Cc: Heiko Carstens, Claudio Imbrenda, Alexander Gordeev, Sasha Levin,
	oleg, gor, linux-s390

From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 8b13601d19c541158a6e18b278c00ba69ae37829 ]

If the content of the floating point control (fpc) register of a traced
process is modified with the ptrace interface the new value is tested for
validity by temporarily loading it into the fpc register.

This may lead to corruption of the fpc register of the tracing process:
if an interrupt happens while the value is temporarily loaded into the
fpc register, and within interrupt context floating point or vector
registers are used, the current fp/vx registers are saved with
save_fpu_regs() assuming they belong to user space and will be loaded into
fp/vx registers when returning to user space.

test_fp_ctl() restores the original user space fpc register value, however
it will be discarded, when returning to user space.

In result the tracer will incorrectly continue to run with the value that
was supposed to be used for the traced process.

Fix this by saving fpu register contents with save_fpu_regs() before using
test_fp_ctl().

Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
index 516c21baf3ad..014ed5b27027 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -392,6 +392,7 @@ static int __poke_user(struct task_struct *child, addr_t addr, addr_t data)
 		/*
 		 * floating point control reg. is in the thread structure
 		 */
+		save_fpu_regs();
 		if ((unsigned int) data != 0 ||
 		    test_fp_ctl(data >> (BITS_PER_LONG - 32)))
 			return -EINVAL;
@@ -754,6 +755,7 @@ static int __poke_user_compat(struct task_struct *child,
 		/*
 		 * floating point control reg. is in the thread structure
 		 */
+		save_fpu_regs();
 		if (test_fp_ctl(tmp))
 			return -EINVAL;
 		child->thread.fpu.fpc = data;
@@ -917,9 +919,7 @@ static int s390_fpregs_set(struct task_struct *target,
 	int rc = 0;
 	freg_t fprs[__NUM_FPRS];
 
-	if (target == current)
-		save_fpu_regs();
-
+	save_fpu_regs();
 	if (MACHINE_HAS_VX)
 		convert_vx_to_fp(fprs, target->thread.fpu.vxrs);
 	else
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 04/11] KVM: s390: fix setting of fpc register
  2024-01-16  1:07 [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 01/11] arch: consolidate arch_irq_work_raise prototypes Sasha Levin
  2024-01-16  1:07 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 03/11] s390/ptrace: handle setting of fpc register correctly Sasha Levin
@ 2024-01-16  1:07 ` Sasha Levin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2024-01-16  1:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, stable
  Cc: Heiko Carstens, Christian Borntraeger, Claudio Imbrenda,
	Alexander Gordeev, Sasha Levin, frankja, gor, kvm, linux-s390

From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit b988b1bb0053c0dcd26187d29ef07566a565cf55 ]

kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_fpu() allows to set the floating point control
(fpc) register of a guest cpu. The new value is tested for validity by
temporarily loading it into the fpc register.

This may lead to corruption of the fpc register of the host process:
if an interrupt happens while the value is temporarily loaded into the fpc
register, and within interrupt context floating point or vector registers
are used, the current fp/vx registers are saved with save_fpu_regs()
assuming they belong to user space and will be loaded into fp/vx registers
when returning to user space.

test_fp_ctl() restores the original user space / host process fpc register
value, however it will be discarded, when returning to user space.

In result the host process will incorrectly continue to run with the value
that was supposed to be used for a guest cpu.

Fix this by simply removing the test. There is another test right before
the SIE context is entered which will handles invalid values.

This results in a change of behaviour: invalid values will now be accepted
instead of that the ioctl fails with -EINVAL. This seems to be acceptable,
given that this interface is most likely not used anymore, and this is in
addition the same behaviour implemented with the memory mapped interface
(replace invalid values with zero) - see sync_regs() in kvm-s390.c.

Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 5 -----
 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
index eb97db59b236..5526f782249c 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
@@ -3700,10 +3700,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_fpu *fpu)
 
 	vcpu_load(vcpu);
 
-	if (test_fp_ctl(fpu->fpc)) {
-		ret = -EINVAL;
-		goto out;
-	}
 	vcpu->run->s.regs.fpc = fpu->fpc;
 	if (MACHINE_HAS_VX)
 		convert_fp_to_vx((__vector128 *) vcpu->run->s.regs.vrs,
@@ -3711,7 +3707,6 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_fpu *fpu)
 	else
 		memcpy(vcpu->run->s.regs.fprs, &fpu->fprs, sizeof(fpu->fprs));
 
-out:
 	vcpu_put(vcpu);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-16  1:07 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-01-16  1:07 [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 01/11] arch: consolidate arch_irq_work_raise prototypes Sasha Levin
2024-01-16  1:07 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 03/11] s390/ptrace: handle setting of fpc register correctly Sasha Levin
2024-01-16  1:07 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.15 04/11] KVM: s390: fix setting of fpc register Sasha Levin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox