* [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1] s390x: add pv-attest to unittests.cfg
@ 2024-02-01 10:07 Nico Boehr
2024-02-01 10:09 ` Janosch Frank
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nico Boehr @ 2024-02-01 10:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: frankja, imbrenda, thuth; +Cc: kvm, linux-s390
There seems to be no obvious reason why it shouldn't be there.
Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
---
s390x/unittests.cfg | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/s390x/unittests.cfg b/s390x/unittests.cfg
index f5024b6eefd9..018e4129ffac 100644
--- a/s390x/unittests.cfg
+++ b/s390x/unittests.cfg
@@ -383,3 +383,6 @@ extra_params = """-cpu max,ctop=on -smp cpus=1,drawers=2,books=2,sockets=2,cores
[sie-dat]
file = sie-dat.elf
+
+[pv-attest]
+file = pv-attest.elf
--
2.41.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1] s390x: add pv-attest to unittests.cfg
2024-02-01 10:07 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1] s390x: add pv-attest to unittests.cfg Nico Boehr
@ 2024-02-01 10:09 ` Janosch Frank
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Janosch Frank @ 2024-02-01 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nico Boehr, imbrenda, thuth; +Cc: kvm, linux-s390
On 2/1/24 11:07, Nico Boehr wrote:
> There seems to be no obvious reason why it shouldn't be there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
This has been in the CI for months, so consider this to be applied and:
Reviewed-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-01 10:09 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-01 10:07 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v1] s390x: add pv-attest to unittests.cfg Nico Boehr
2024-02-01 10:09 ` Janosch Frank
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox