Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/108] 5.10.222-rc1 review

Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/108] 5.10.222-rc1 review

[Naresh Kamboju]

On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 21:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.222 release.
> There are 108 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:27:21 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.222-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h


The 390 builds failed on stable-rc 5.10.222-rc1 review; it has been
reported on 6.6, 6.1, 5.15 and now on 5.10.

Started from this round of stable rc on 5.10.222-rc1

  Good:6db6c4ec363b ("Linux 5.10.221-rc2")
  BAD: 4ec8d630a600 ("Linux 5.10.222-rc1")

* s390, build
  - clang-18-allnoconfig
  - clang-18-defconfig
  - clang-18-tinyconfig
  - clang-nightly-allnoconfig
  - clang-nightly-defconfig
  - clang-nightly-tinyconfig
  - gcc-12-allnoconfig
  - gcc-12-defconfig
  - gcc-12-tinyconfig
  - gcc-8-allnoconfig
  - gcc-8-defconfig-fe40093d
  - gcc-8-tinyconfig


Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>

Build log:
-------
linux/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h: In function '__load_psw_mask':
arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:255:19: error: expected '=', ',',
';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '__uninitialized'
  255 |         psw_t psw __uninitialized;
      |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:255:19: error: '__uninitialized'
undeclared (first use in this function)
arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:255:19: note: each undeclared
identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:256:9: warning: ISO C90 forbids
mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
  256 |         unsigned long addr;
      |         ^~~~~~~~
arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:258:9: error: 'psw' undeclared
(first use in this function); did you mean 'psw_t'?
  258 |         psw.mask = mask;
      |         ^~~
      |         psw_t

metadata:
---------
  config: https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2jKrKyHqAZ7eSsKwMSVqDueYpKo/config
  download_url:
https://storage.tuxsuite.com/public/linaro/lkft/builds/2jKrKyHqAZ7eSsKwMSVqDueYpKo/
  git_describe: v5.10.221-109-g4ec8d630a600
  git_repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
  git_sha: 4ec8d630a6005e1aa82671aca9f6716039f5b6e7
  git_short_log: 4ec8d630a600 ("Linux 5.10.222-rc1")
  arch: s390
  toolchain: gcc-12 and clang-18

Steps to reproduce:
----------
# tuxmake --runtime podman --target-arch s390 --toolchain gcc-12
--kconfig tinyconfig

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/108] 5.10.222-rc1 review

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Wed, Jul 17, 2024 at 02:17:51AM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 21:12, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.222 release.
> > There are 108 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Thu, 18 Jul 2024 15:27:21 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> >         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.10.222-rc1.gz
> > or in the git tree and branch at:
> >         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.10.y
> > and the diffstat can be found below.
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > greg k-h
> 
> 
> The 390 builds failed on stable-rc 5.10.222-rc1 review; it has been
> reported on 6.6, 6.1, 5.15 and now on 5.10.
> 
> Started from this round of stable rc on 5.10.222-rc1
> 
>   Good:6db6c4ec363b ("Linux 5.10.221-rc2")
>   BAD: 4ec8d630a600 ("Linux 5.10.222-rc1")
> 
> * s390, build
>   - clang-18-allnoconfig
>   - clang-18-defconfig
>   - clang-18-tinyconfig
>   - clang-nightly-allnoconfig
>   - clang-nightly-defconfig
>   - clang-nightly-tinyconfig
>   - gcc-12-allnoconfig
>   - gcc-12-defconfig
>   - gcc-12-tinyconfig
>   - gcc-8-allnoconfig
>   - gcc-8-defconfig-fe40093d
>   - gcc-8-tinyconfig
> 
> 
> Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
> 
> Build log:
> -------
> linux/arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h: In function '__load_psw_mask':
> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:255:19: error: expected '=', ',',
> ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '__uninitialized'
>   255 |         psw_t psw __uninitialized;
>       |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:255:19: error: '__uninitialized'
> undeclared (first use in this function)
> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:255:19: note: each undeclared
> identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:256:9: warning: ISO C90 forbids
> mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement]
>   256 |         unsigned long addr;
>       |         ^~~~~~~~
> arch/s390/include/asm/processor.h:258:9: error: 'psw' undeclared
> (first use in this function); did you mean 'psw_t'?
>   258 |         psw.mask = mask;
>       |         ^~~
>       |         psw_t

Should now be fixed, will push out -rc2 releases later today with the
attempted resolution.

greg k-h