Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
	Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: s390: selftests: Extended user_operexec tests
Date: Thu,  7 May 2026 22:08:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260507200836.3500368-3-farman@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260507200836.3500368-1-farman@linux.ibm.com>

There is a possibility that the user_operexec capability
only works if facility bit 74 is enabled. This is now fixed,
but add a selftest to demonstrate that.

Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
---
 .../selftests/kvm/include/s390/facility.h     |   6 +
 .../selftests/kvm/s390/user_operexec.c        | 110 ++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 116 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390/facility.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390/facility.h
index 41a265742666..e5259f63be22 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390/facility.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/s390/facility.h
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
 #ifndef SELFTEST_KVM_FACILITY_H
 #define SELFTEST_KVM_FACILITY_H
 
+#include <linux/atomic.h>
 #include <linux/bitops.h>
 
 /* alt_stfle_fac_list[16] + stfle_fac_list[16] */
@@ -19,6 +20,11 @@
 extern u64 stfl_doublewords[NB_STFL_DOUBLEWORDS];
 extern bool stfle_flag;
 
+static inline bool clear_bit_inv(unsigned long nr, unsigned long *ptr)
+{
+	return clear_bit(nr ^ (BITS_PER_LONG - 1), ptr);
+}
+
 static inline bool test_bit_inv(unsigned long nr, const unsigned long *ptr)
 {
 	return test_bit(nr ^ (BITS_PER_LONG - 1), ptr);
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390/user_operexec.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390/user_operexec.c
index 714906c1d12a..b24c1f9dbbe8 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390/user_operexec.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/s390/user_operexec.c
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
  * Authors:
  *  Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
  */
+#include "facility.h"
 #include "kselftest.h"
 #include "kvm_util.h"
 #include "test_util.h"
@@ -109,6 +110,111 @@ static void test_user_operexec_combined(void)
 	kvm_vm_free(vm);
 }
 
+static struct kvm_vm *create_vm_without_sthyi(void)
+{
+	struct kvm_s390_vm_cpu_processor info;
+	struct kvm_vm *vm;
+
+	vm = vm_create(1);
+
+	kvm_device_attr_get(vm->fd, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MODEL,
+			    KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR, &info);
+
+	clear_bit_inv(74, (unsigned long *)&info.fac_list);
+	kvm_device_attr_set(vm->fd, KVM_S390_VM_CPU_MODEL,
+			    KVM_S390_VM_CPU_PROCESSOR, &info);
+
+	return vm;
+}
+
+static void test_user_instr0_no_stfle_74(void)
+{
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+	struct kvm_vm *vm;
+	int rc;
+
+	vm = create_vm_without_sthyi();
+
+	rc = __vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_S390_USER_INSTR0, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, rc);
+
+	vcpu = vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0, guest_code_instr0);
+
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->s390_sieic.icptcode, ICPT_OPEREXC);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->s390_sieic.ipa, 0x0000);
+
+	kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
+static void test_user_operexec_no_stfle_74(void)
+{
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+	struct kvm_vm *vm;
+	int rc;
+
+	vm = create_vm_without_sthyi();
+
+	rc = __vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_S390_USER_OPEREXEC, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, rc);
+
+	vcpu = vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0, guest_code_user_operexec);
+
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->s390_sieic.icptcode, ICPT_OPEREXC);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->s390_sieic.ipa, 0x0807);
+
+	kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
+static void test_instr0_combined_no_stfle_74(void)
+{
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+	struct kvm_vm *vm;
+	int rc;
+
+	vm = create_vm_without_sthyi();
+
+	rc = __vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_S390_USER_INSTR0, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, rc);
+	rc = __vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_S390_USER_OPEREXEC, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, rc);
+
+	vcpu = vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0, guest_code_instr0);
+
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->s390_sieic.icptcode, ICPT_OPEREXC);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->s390_sieic.ipa, 0x0000);
+
+	kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
+static void test_operexec_combined_no_stfle_74(void)
+{
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+	struct kvm_vm *vm;
+	int rc;
+
+	vm = create_vm_without_sthyi();
+
+	rc = __vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_S390_USER_INSTR0, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, rc);
+	rc = __vm_enable_cap(vm, KVM_CAP_S390_USER_OPEREXEC, 0);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(0, rc);
+
+	vcpu = vm_vcpu_add(vm, 0, guest_code_user_operexec);
+
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_S390_SIEIC);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->s390_sieic.icptcode, ICPT_OPEREXC);
+	TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->s390_sieic.ipa, 0x0807);
+
+	kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
 /*
  * Run all tests above.
  *
@@ -122,6 +228,10 @@ static struct testdef {
 	{ "instr0", test_user_instr0 },
 	{ "operexec", test_user_operexec },
 	{ "operexec_combined", test_user_operexec_combined},
+	{ "instr0_no_stfle_74", test_user_instr0_no_stfle_74 },
+	{ "instr0_combined_no_stfle_74", test_instr0_combined_no_stfle_74 },
+	{ "operexec_combined_no_stfle_74", test_operexec_combined_no_stfle_74 },
+	{ "operexec_no_stfle_74", test_user_operexec_no_stfle_74 },
 };
 
 int main(int argc, char *argv[])
-- 
2.51.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-07 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-07 20:08 [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: s390: Toggle operation exception for userspace Eric Farman
2026-05-07 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " Eric Farman
2026-05-08  9:54   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-05-11  8:01   ` Janosch Frank
2026-05-11  8:08   ` Janosch Frank
2026-05-11 12:56     ` Eric Farman
2026-05-07 20:08 ` Eric Farman [this message]
2026-05-08 10:05   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: s390: selftests: Extended user_operexec tests Christian Borntraeger
2026-05-08 10:30   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2026-05-11  8:04   ` Janosch Frank
2026-05-07 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: s390: Fix typo in UCONTROL documentation Eric Farman
2026-05-08 10:29   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2026-05-11 10:59   ` Hendrik Brueckner
2026-05-08 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: s390: Toggle operation exception for userspace Christian Borntraeger
2026-05-08 13:08   ` Eric Farman
2026-05-08 14:50 ` Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260507200836.3500368-3-farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox