Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: s390: Toggle operation exception for userspace
Date: Fri, 08 May 2026 09:08:14 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <66f7c47f9931bfc9be47c7f6d02861bd3f3f37e8.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1ac58dd8-1b06-42b5-9a19-67620b4fdc25@linux.ibm.com>

On Fri, 2026-05-08 at 12:07 +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> Am 07.05.26 um 22:08 schrieb Eric Farman:
> > Claudio, et al,
> > 
> > Here's an update to the USER_OPEREXEC patch I'd sent the other day.
> > Besides the addition of Claudio's r-b (thank you!), Patch 1 is identical.
> > 
> > Patch 2 contains a couple of new selftests. As it stands, they all run
> > with patch 1 applied, but I put the failing test at the end for if
> > Patch 1 is missing.
> > 
> > Patch 3 is unrelated, but is a minor typo I stumbled on yesterday while
> > looking at this. It seems small enough that a second `git send-email`
> > command seems unnecessary. :)
> > 
> > Eric Farman (3):
> >    KVM: s390: Toggle operation exception for userspace
> >    KVM: s390: selftests: Extended user_operexec tests
> >    KVM: s390: Fix typo in UCONTROL documentation
> > 
> >   Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst                |   2 +-
> >   arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c                      |   3 +-
> >   .../selftests/kvm/include/s390/facility.h     |   6 +
> >   .../selftests/kvm/s390/user_operexec.c        | 110 ++++++++++++++++++
> >   4 files changed, 119 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> 
> Independent from this series (which makes sense on its own)
> shouldnt we add another fixup so that we send these kernel injects also to userspace?
> 

Hrm, that's a reasonable idea for the ones in priv.c (intercept.c are already covered, see below).
I'll see if I can find a way to unify (and test) them.

> 
> git grep PGM_OPERATION linux/master arch/s390/kvm/
> linux/master:arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c:         return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_OPERATION);

This is handle_sthyi(), called by handle_operexc(), if stfle.74 is not present.

> linux/master:arch/s390/kvm/intercept.c: return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_OPERATION);

This is handle_operexc(), if neither user_instr0 nor user_operexec are present.

> linux/master:arch/s390/kvm/priv.c:              return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_OPERATION);
> linux/master:arch/s390/kvm/priv.c:              return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_OPERATION);
> linux/master:arch/s390/kvm/priv.c:              return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_OPERATION);
> linux/master:arch/s390/kvm/priv.c:              return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_OPERATION);
> linux/master:arch/s390/kvm/priv.c:              return kvm_s390_inject_program_int(vcpu, PGM_OPERATION)

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-08 13:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-07 20:08 [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: s390: Toggle operation exception for userspace Eric Farman
2026-05-07 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] " Eric Farman
2026-05-08  9:54   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-05-11  8:01   ` Janosch Frank
2026-05-11  8:08   ` Janosch Frank
2026-05-11 12:56     ` Eric Farman
2026-05-07 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] KVM: s390: selftests: Extended user_operexec tests Eric Farman
2026-05-08 10:05   ` Christian Borntraeger
2026-05-08 10:30   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2026-05-11  8:04   ` Janosch Frank
2026-05-07 20:08 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: s390: Fix typo in UCONTROL documentation Eric Farman
2026-05-08 10:29   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2026-05-11 10:59   ` Hendrik Brueckner
2026-05-08 10:07 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: s390: Toggle operation exception for userspace Christian Borntraeger
2026-05-08 13:08   ` Eric Farman [this message]
2026-05-08 14:50 ` Christian Borntraeger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=66f7c47f9931bfc9be47c7f6d02861bd3f3f37e8.camel@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=farman@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox