From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
Cc: "Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] x86/mm: stop marking vmemmap as SECTION_INFO
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 15:10:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708151003.843391F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708-bootmem_info_part2-v1-5-156ce4986598@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Kernel page table pages (PGD, P4D, PUD, PMD) permanently leak during memory hot-remove due to mismatched reference counting.
- [High] Kernel page table pages and vmemmap physical pages are synchronously freed to the buddy allocator BEFORE their corresponding higher-level page table entries are cleared, causing a Use-After-Free.
--
--- Patch [5]: [PATCH 05/10] x86/mm: stop marking vmemmap as SECTION_INFO ---
commit 9fecf5a2d51cb3529c85d6e643dda7a25adb7fd1
Author: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>
x86/mm: stop marking vmemmap as SECTION_INFO
This commit removes the remaining vmemmap bootmem registration machinery
which is no longer required. It stops marking vmemmap pages as
SECTION_INFO and allows free_vmemmap_pages() to free reserved pages
directly.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> index 320e742b0bb3f..82bb0384b8ab0 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> @@ -1024,19 +1024,12 @@ static void __meminit free_vmemmap_pages(struct page *page, unsigned int order,
[ ... ]
> - } else {
> + else
> __free_pages(page, order);
> - }
> }
>
> static void __meminit free_pte_table(pte_t *pte_start, pmd_t *pmd)
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this function (and others like it)
free the PTE table page before clearing the corresponding PMD entry?
Looking at free_pte_table(), free_pagetable() frees the PTE table page
to the buddy allocator. Only after this does the code acquire
init_mm.page_table_lock and call pmd_clear() to unlink it:
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c:free_pte_table() {
...
free_pagetable(pmd_page(*pmd));
spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
pmd_clear(pmd);
...
}
Because init_mm is shared globally, could a hardware MMU page table walk
on another CPU speculatively traverse the still-valid PMD entry into
the freed page before the pmd_clear() occurs?
If the buddy allocator reallocates this page to userspace and it is
populated with user-controlled data, could this lead to a use-after-free
and potential privilege escalation?
A similar pattern appears to exist in remove_pte_table() for physical
vmemmap pages.
[ ... ]
> @@ -1593,12 +1586,8 @@ void register_page_bootmem_memmap(unsigned long section_nr,
> p4d_t *p4d;
> pud_t *pud;
> pmd_t *pmd;
> - unsigned int nr_pmd_pages;
> - struct page *page;
>
> for (; addr < end; addr = next) {
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does this loop permanently
leak kernel page table pages during memory hot-remove?
When vmemmap is mapped with 4KB base pages (e.g., if huge pages are not
used), the loop steps forward by PAGE_SIZE. In each iteration, it calls
get_page_bootmem() on the intermediate page table pages (like pgd_page
and pmd_page), unconditionally incrementing the page refcount.
Because a PMD covers 2MB, the loop visits the exact same pmd_page 512
times, incrementing its refcount by 512.
However, during memory hot-remove, when the page table is emptied,
free_pmd_table() calls free_pagetable() exactly once, which decrements
the refcount by only 1:
arch/x86/mm/init_64.c:free_pmd_table() {
...
free_pagetable(pud_page(*pud));
...
}
Will the refcount fail to reach 0, permanently leaking the page table
page during hot-remove?
> - pte_t *pte = NULL;
> -
> pgd = pgd_offset_k(addr);
> if (pgd_none(*pgd)) {
> next = (addr + PAGE_SIZE) & PAGE_MASK;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708-bootmem_info_part2-v1-0-156ce4986598@kernel.org?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-08 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 14:10 [PATCH 00/10] mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE (Part 2) David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 14:10 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86/mm: drop order parameter from free_pagetable() David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 14:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 15:15 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-09 2:32 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-08 14:10 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm: provide free_reserved_pages(), removing x86 variant David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 15:13 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-09 6:19 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-08 14:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] s390/mm: use free_reserved_pages() in vmem_free_pages() David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-09 6:12 ` Heiko Carstens
2026-07-09 6:21 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-08 14:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm/bootmem_info: allow calling free_bootmem_page() on pages without a bootmem_type David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 14:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09 6:23 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 05/10] x86/mm: stop marking vmemmap as SECTION_INFO David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 15:10 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-08 15:20 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 06/10] x86/mm: stop marking page tables as MIX_SECTION_INFO David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 15:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 15:27 ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 07/10] x86/mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 15:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm/hugetlb_vmemmap: remove bootmem_info leftovers David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-09 6:26 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm/sparse: remove bootmem_info.h include David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-09 6:26 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm/bootmem_info: remove CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-09 6:27 ` Muchun Song
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH 00/10] mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE (Part 2) Andrew Morton
2026-07-09 9:36 ` Mike Rapoport
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260708151003.843391F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox