linux-s390.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] x86/mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE
Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2026 15:38:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260708153842.93C111F00A3F@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260708-bootmem_info_part2-v1-7-156ce4986598@kernel.org>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:

New issues:
- [Medium] Incomplete feature removal leaves behind dead code.

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Page tables and vmemmap target pages are freed to the buddy allocator before their page table entries are cleared, causing a Use-After-Free race with hardware page table walkers.
--

--- Patch [7]: [PATCH 07/10] x86/mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE ---
commit 4f73978273a221d985e72d75af30f38db0280de6
Author: David Hildenbrand (Arm) <david@kernel.org>

x86/mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE
    
CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE now essentially doesn't do anything.
So let's remove support for CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> index 1b17dcf781e66..ab4c5a02326f7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/init_64.c

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/mm/Kconfig b/mm/Kconfig
> index f794a341d7422..592003a258bad 100644
> --- a/mm/Kconfig
> +++ b/mm/Kconfig
> @@ -590,7 +590,6 @@ endchoice
>  
>  config MEMORY_HOTREMOVE
>  	bool "Allow for memory hot remove"
> -	select HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE if X86_64

[Severity: Medium]
Since the intention of this commit is to remove support for 
CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE, should the definition of the config itself 
also be deleted?

Currently, `config HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE` remains in mm/Kconfig as a dead 
`def_bool n` option. Additionally, `mm/bootmem_info.c` and its build rule 
`obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE) += bootmem_info.o` in mm/Makefile are 
left behind as dead code.

>  	depends on MEMORY_HOTPLUG
>  	select MIGRATION
>  

[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but while reviewing the memory 
hot-remove code in arch/x86/mm/init_64.c, I noticed that page tables and 
vmemmap target pages appear to be freed to the buddy allocator before their 
page table entries are actually cleared.

In arch/x86/mm/init_64.c:free_pte_table():

	/* free a pte table */
	free_pagetable(pmd_page(*pmd));
	spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
	pmd_clear(pmd);

And similarly in arch/x86/mm/init_64.c:remove_pte_table():

			if (!direct)
				/* We never populate base pages from the altmap. */
				free_vmemmap_pages(pte_page(*pte), 0, NULL);

			spin_lock(&init_mm.page_table_lock);
			pte_clear(&init_mm, addr, pte);

Does this open a use-after-free race window where hardware page table walkers 
or speculative execution could access the recently-freed memory and interpret 
arbitrary data as page tables before the clear operation completes?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260708-bootmem_info_part2-v1-0-156ce4986598@kernel.org?part=7

  reply	other threads:[~2026-07-08 15:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-08 14:10 [PATCH 00/10] mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE (Part 2) David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 14:10 ` [PATCH 01/10] x86/mm: drop order parameter from free_pagetable() David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 14:22   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 15:15   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-09  2:32   ` Muchun Song
2026-07-08 14:10 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm: provide free_reserved_pages(), removing x86 variant David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 15:13   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-09  6:19   ` Muchun Song
2026-07-08 14:10 ` [PATCH 03/10] s390/mm: use free_reserved_pages() in vmem_free_pages() David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-09  6:12   ` Heiko Carstens
2026-07-09  6:21   ` Muchun Song
2026-07-08 14:10 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm/bootmem_info: allow calling free_bootmem_page() on pages without a bootmem_type David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 14:53   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-09  6:23   ` Muchun Song
2026-07-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 05/10] x86/mm: stop marking vmemmap as SECTION_INFO David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 15:10   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 15:20   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 06/10] x86/mm: stop marking page tables as MIX_SECTION_INFO David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 15:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 15:27   ` David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 07/10] x86/mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-08 15:38   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm/hugetlb_vmemmap: remove bootmem_info leftovers David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-09  6:26   ` Muchun Song
2026-07-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm/sparse: remove bootmem_info.h include David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-09  6:26   ` Muchun Song
2026-07-08 14:11 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm/bootmem_info: remove CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE David Hildenbrand (Arm)
2026-07-09  6:27   ` Muchun Song
2026-07-08 21:24 ` [PATCH 00/10] mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_BOOTMEM_INFO_NODE (Part 2) Andrew Morton
2026-07-09  9:36 ` Mike Rapoport

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260708153842.93C111F00A3F@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).