From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/10] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Add missing locking around gmap_remove_child()
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 16:14:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260727161453.AF7AC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727150254.236021-6-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Unconditional free of physical page 0 on error path in kvm_s390_vcpu_setup() when CMMA is disabled.
--
--- Patch [5]: [PATCH v3 05/10] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Add missing locking around gmap_remove_child() ---
commit 23ca669df08a6ebee3b62a02dbada5159020162e
Author: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: s390: ucontrol: Add missing locking around gmap_remove_child()
gmap_remove_child() needs to be called while holding the children_lock
of the parent gmap. This was not the case in the error handling path of
kvm_arch_vcpu_create() for UCONTROL guests.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index 0a44351722702..e2a15799b9ac3 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> @@ -3867,7 +3867,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_create(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>
> out_ucontrol_uninit:
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is it possible for the error handling path
in kvm_s390_vcpu_setup() to accidentally free physical page 0?
In kvm_s390_vcpu_setup(), if use_cmma is 0, kvm_s390_vcpu_setup_cmma() is
skipped and vcpu->arch.sie_block->cbrlo is left at its initialized value
of 0.
If a subsequent step like kvm_s390_pv_create_cpu() fails, the error path
unconditionally triggers the CMMA cleanup:
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c:kvm_s390_vcpu_setup() {
...
if (rc)
goto out_free_cpu;
...
out_free_cpu:
kvm_s390_vcpu_unsetup_cmma(vcpu);
...
}
Inside kvm_s390_vcpu_unsetup_cmma(), the page is freed without checking if
CMMA was actually initialized:
arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c:kvm_s390_vcpu_unsetup_cmma() {
...
free_page((unsigned long)phys_to_virt(vcpu->arch.sie_block->cbrlo));
...
}
On s390, phys_to_virt(0) evaluates to __identity_base. When KASLR is enabled,
this is a non-zero virtual address that maps exactly to physical page 0.
Because the resulting virtual address is non-zero, it bypasses the addr != 0
safeguard in free_pages(), which could cause physical page 0 (containing
s390 lowcore data) to be freed into the buddy allocator.
Would it make sense to verify use_cmma is enabled or that cbrlo is non-zero
before freeing this page?
> if (kvm_is_ucontrol(vcpu->kvm)) {
> + spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.gmap->children_lock);
> gmap_remove_child(vcpu->arch.gmap);
> + spin_unlock(&vcpu->kvm->arch.gmap->children_lock);
> vcpu->arch.gmap = gmap_put(vcpu->arch.gmap);
> }
> out_free_sie_block:
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260727150254.236021-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com?part=5
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 15:02 [PATCH v3 00/10] KVM: s390: Misc fixes Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] KVM: s390: Fix unlikely NULL gmap dereference Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 15:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] KVM: s390: Fix leaking of PGM_ADDRESSING to userspace Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 15:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] KVM: s390: Fix race in __do_essa() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 15:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] KVM: s390: cmma: Fix dirty tracking when removing memslot Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 16:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Add missing locking around gmap_remove_child() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 16:14 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] KVM: s390: Fix overclearing ESCA in case of error Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 16:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] KVM: s390: Return -EINTR if a signal was pending while faulting-in Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 16:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] KVM: s390: Free the mmu cache when kvm_arch_vcpu_create() fails Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 17:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] KVM: s390: Fix ordering when adding to SCA Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 17:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] KVM: s390: Fix cleanup in kvm_s390_pv_create_cpu() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 17:18 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260727161453.AF7AC1F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox