From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] KVM: s390: Fix overclearing ESCA in case of error
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2026 16:33:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260727163329.3996E1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260727150254.236021-7-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] For UCONTROL VMs, the ESCA block CPU array is accessed out of bounds because vCPU IDs up to 254 are permitted, exceeding the array's size of 248.
--
--- Patch [6]: [PATCH v3 06/10] KVM: s390: Fix overclearing ESCA in case of error ---
commit 711c5a0b8c8ac3214d997bede21c76e30e58d712
Author: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: s390: Fix overclearing ESCA in case of error
This commit modifies vCPU destruction to skip clearing the ESCA entry if
the vCPU was not successfully initialized.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> index 9e3e6b0d72ad6..2acdff130fa6c 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ static void sca_clear_ext_call(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> struct esca_block *sca = vcpu->kvm->arch.sca;
> union esca_sigp_ctrl *sigp_ctrl = &sca->cpu[vcpu->vcpu_id].sigp_ctrl;
>
> - if (!kvm_s390_use_sca_entries())
> + if (!kvm_s390_use_sca_entries() || !vcpu->arch.initialized)
> return;
> kvm_s390_clear_cpuflags(vcpu, CPUSTAT_ECALL_PEND);
>
> WRITE_ONCE(sigp_ctrl->value, 0);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does this code write past the bounds of
the esca_block allocation for UCONTROL VMs?
Looking at kvm_arch_vcpu_precreate() in arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c, the
bounds check for ESCA CPU slots is explicitly bypassed for UCONTROL VMs:
if (!kvm_is_ucontrol(kvm) && !sca_can_add_vcpu(kvm, id))
return -EINVAL;
This allows vCPU IDs up to 254. However, the ESCA block CPU array only has
248 slots, and the block itself is allocated as exactly 4 pages.
When destroying a vCPU with an ID >= 248, the write operation in this
function appears to access memory past the end of the esca_block.
A similar situation seems to happen in sca_inject_ext_call() when
processing external calls:
arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c:sca_inject_ext_call() {
...
union esca_sigp_ctrl *sigp_ctrl = &sca->cpu[vcpu->vcpu_id].sigp_ctrl;
...
rc = cmpxchg(&sigp_ctrl->value, old_val.value, new_val.value);
...
}
Could this lead to kernel memory corruption if a UCONTROL VM is created
with large vCPU IDs?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260727150254.236021-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-27 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-27 15:02 [PATCH v3 00/10] KVM: s390: Misc fixes Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] KVM: s390: Fix unlikely NULL gmap dereference Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 15:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] KVM: s390: Fix leaking of PGM_ADDRESSING to userspace Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 15:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] KVM: s390: Fix race in __do_essa() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 15:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] KVM: s390: cmma: Fix dirty tracking when removing memslot Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 16:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Add missing locking around gmap_remove_child() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 16:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] KVM: s390: Fix overclearing ESCA in case of error Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 16:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] KVM: s390: Return -EINTR if a signal was pending while faulting-in Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 16:59 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] KVM: s390: Free the mmu cache when kvm_arch_vcpu_create() fails Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 17:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] KVM: s390: Fix ordering when adding to SCA Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 17:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-27 15:02 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] KVM: s390: Fix cleanup in kvm_s390_pv_create_cpu() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-27 17:18 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260727163329.3996E1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox