From: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
To: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>,
Holger Dengler <dengler@linux.ibm.com>,
Vineeth Vijayan <vneethv@linux.ibm.com>,
Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] s390/crypto: Replace cond_resched() with msleep(1)
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 17:04:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260728150412.3893933-2-hca@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260728150412.3893933-1-hca@linux.ibm.com>
With [1] cond_resched() is always compiled away and becomes a no-op.
The comments for all cond_resched() calls in crypto code however indicate
that the current process should be scheduled away to avoid instant
re-invocation of a callback. This is not what cond_resched() would do or
did.
Instead of just removing the cond_resched() calls, replace them with
msleep() calls, as suggested by Holger Dengler. This forces the current
task to be scheduled away (sleeps) like originally intended.
[1] commit 7dadeaa6e851 ("sched: Further restrict the preemption modes")
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c | 8 ++++----
arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
index 8cfe6166c193..511cb6105436 100644
--- a/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
@@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static int ecb_paes_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
* To avoid immediately re-invocation of this callback,
* tell the scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
*/
- cond_resched();
+ msleep(1);
pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
return -ENOSPC;
} else if (rc) {
@@ -821,7 +821,7 @@ static int cbc_paes_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
* To avoid immediately re-invocation of this callback,
* tell the scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
*/
- cond_resched();
+ msleep(1);
pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
return -ENOSPC;
} else if (rc) {
@@ -1129,7 +1129,7 @@ static int ctr_paes_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
* To avoid immediately re-invocation of this callback,
* tell the scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
*/
- cond_resched();
+ msleep(1);
pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
return -ENOSPC;
} else if (rc) {
@@ -1572,7 +1572,7 @@ static int xts_paes_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
* To avoid immediately re-invocation of this callback,
* tell the scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
*/
- cond_resched();
+ msleep(1);
pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
return -ENOSPC;
} else if (rc) {
diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c
index 03ca33ffe6cc..da76c7beb184 100644
--- a/arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c
+++ b/arch/s390/crypto/phmac_s390.c
@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ static int phmac_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
* tell scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
*/
pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
- cond_resched();
+ msleep(1);
return -ENOSPC;
} else if (rc) {
hwh_advance(hwh, rc);
@@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ static int phmac_do_one_request(struct crypto_engine *engine, void *areq)
* tell scheduler to voluntarily give up the CPU here.
*/
pr_debug("rescheduling request\n");
- cond_resched();
+ msleep(1);
return -ENOSPC;
}
break;
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-28 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-28 15:04 [PATCH v2 0/4] s390: Remove or replace cond_resched() calls Heiko Carstens
2026-07-28 15:04 ` Heiko Carstens [this message]
2026-07-28 15:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] s390/crypto: Replace cond_resched() with msleep(1) sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 16:12 ` Holger Dengler
2026-07-28 16:13 ` Harald Freudenberger
2026-07-28 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: s390: Remove cond_resched() calls Heiko Carstens
2026-07-28 15:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] " Heiko Carstens
2026-07-28 15:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-28 15:04 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] s390/cio: " Heiko Carstens
2026-07-28 15:48 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260728150412.3893933-2-hca@linux.ibm.com \
--to=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=dengler@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox