Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Introduce arch_do_panic

[Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>]

On Wed, Jul 29, 2026 at 12:48:49PM +0200, Mete Durlu wrote:
> On 29/07/2026 10:56, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 27, 2026 at 12:36:19PM +0200, Mete Durlu wrote:
> > Putting the define in a different header file per architecture doesn't
> > seem to be a good idea. There is no guarantee that this will work. So
> > either you find a common header file, where it is known that is (and
> > will be) included in panic.c, or you go with a weak function.
> 
> I went over the headers included to panic.c, either they are really
> irrelevant or not present on other archs. To me the best candidate
> header seems like "asm/bug.h"
> 
> $ find ./arch/ -name "bug.h" | grep include/asm | wc -l
> 16
> 
> $ ls ./arch | wc -l
> 22 # actually 21 as we shouldn't count Kconfig file
> 
> The architectures missing bug.h in their include/asm/ directory are
> hexagon, microblaze, nios2, um and xtensa
> 
> I believe 16/21 is a good ratio but if this is still not good
> enough, I'd like to fallback to __weak implementation.
> 
> What do you think Heiko?

Then go for __weak and wait if people shout at you :)