From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/13] KVM: s390: cmma: Fix dirty tracking when removing memslot
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2026 17:38:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260729173859.A4C971F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260729152938.782383-8-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] Missing `DAT_WALK_ANY` flag skips swapped-out pages, leaking the CMMA dirty counter.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Silent failure in `kvm_arch_commit_memory_region` leaves KVM memslots and s390 DAT tables out of sync.
--
--- Patch [7]: [PATCH v5 07/13] KVM: s390: cmma: Fix dirty tracking when removing memslot ---
commit 209a02966d18973e5f9b2678eee5bc92d7952603
Author: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>
KVM: s390: cmma: Fix dirty tracking when removing memslot
When a memslot is removed, all ptes that mapped the slot are cleared or
even deallocated. If this happens while the system is in migration
mode, and if cmma-dirty pages are removed, the cmma-dirty counter will
not reflect reality.
Fix by appropriately decrementing the cmma-dirty counter when removing
a memslot.
Opportunistically improve kvm_arch_commit_memory_region() to use
__free() for the struct kvm_s390_mmu_cache.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> index a72ffd515c866..2ae431030621e 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -5804,14 +5804,30 @@ int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static long cmma_d_count_pte(union pte *ptep, gfn_t gfn, gfn_t next, struct dat_walk *walk)
[ ... ]
> void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> struct kvm_memory_slot *old,
> const struct kvm_memory_slot *new,
> enum kvm_mr_change change)
> {
> - struct kvm_s390_mmu_cache *mc = NULL;
> + const struct dat_walk_ops ops = { .pte_entry = cmma_d_count_pte, };
> + struct kvm_s390_mmu_cache *mc __free(kvm_s390_mmu_cache) = NULL;
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but if kvm_s390_new_mmu_cache() fails to
allocate memory and returns NULL later in this function, doesn't it
silently skip updating the DAT tables?
Since kvm_arch_commit_memory_region() returns void, KVM assumes the changes
are applied infallibly. Could this leave KVM memslots and the s390 hardware
DAT tables fatally out of sync under host memory pressure?
> int rc = 0;
>
> + guard(mutex)(&kvm->slots_arch_lock);
> +
> if (change == KVM_MR_FLAGS_ONLY)
> return;
>
> @@ -5822,6 +5838,12 @@ void kvm_arch_commit_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> }
>
> scoped_guard(write_lock, &kvm->mmu_lock) {
> + if (kvm->arch.migration_mode && kvm->arch.use_cmma && old) {
> + _dat_walk_gfn_range(old->base_gfn, old->base_gfn + old->npages,
> + kvm->arch.gmap->asce, &ops, DAT_WALK_IGN_HOLES,
> + &kvm->arch.cmma_dirty_pages);
> + }
[Severity: High]
Does this walk miss swapped-out pages by omitting the DAT_WALK_ANY flag?
If DAT_WALK_ANY is not passed to _dat_walk_gfn_range(), holes are skipped
and cmma_d_count_pte() is never called for swapped-out pages, leaking the
cmma_dirty_pages count.
However, the subsequent dat_delete_slot() will process those same holes and
wipe their dirty status.
Will this cause an infinite loop in userspace migration wait loops if the
dirty count never drops to zero?
> +
> switch (change) {
> case KVM_MR_DELETE:
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260729152938.782383-1-imbrenda@linux.ibm.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-29 15:29 [PATCH v5 00/13] KVM: s390: Misc fixes Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 01/13] KVM: s390: Fix unlikely NULL gmap dereference Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-29 15:43 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 02/13] KVM: s390: Fix kvm_s390_vcpu_unsetup_cmma() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-29 16:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 03/13] KVM: s390: Fix overclearing ESCA in case of error Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-29 16:35 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 04/13] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Fix sca_clear_ext_call() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-29 16:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 05/13] KVM: s390: Fix leaking of PGM_ADDRESSING to userspace Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-29 17:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 06/13] KVM: s390: Fix race in __do_essa() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-29 17:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 07/13] KVM: s390: cmma: Fix dirty tracking when removing memslot Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-29 17:38 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-07-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 08/13] KVM: s390: ucontrol: Add missing locking around gmap_remove_child() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-29 17:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 09/13] KVM: s390: Free the mmu cache when kvm_arch_vcpu_create() fails Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-29 18:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 10/13] KVM: s390: Return -EINTR if a signal was pending while faulting-in Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-29 18:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 11/13] KVM: s390: Fix ordering when adding to SCA Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-29 18:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 12/13] KVM: s390: Fix cleanup in kvm_s390_pv_create_cpu() Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-29 18:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-29 15:29 ` [PATCH v5 13/13] KVM: s390: Fix kvm_arch_commit_memory_region() when low on memory Claudio Imbrenda
2026-07-29 18:53 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260729173859.A4C971F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox