From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Harald Freudenberger" <freude@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] s390/crypto: Fix use of mutex in atomic context in PAES
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 10:50:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260817105059.658DF1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817104203.74033-4-freude@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] The exact same `mutex_trylock()` in atomic context bug fixed by this patch in PAES is also present in standard AES CTR (`arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c`) but was left unpatched.
--
--- Patch [3]: [PATCH v2 3/6] s390/crypto: Fix use of mutex in atomic context in PAES ---
commit e6433be4cd856ce7a9d00fbe2d231629541a50c3
Author: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
s390/crypto: Fix use of mutex in atomic context in PAES
This commit replaces a mutex with a binary semaphore in the PAES CTR
implementation. This prevents panics or lockdep warnings when the CTR
processing is called from atomic or interrupt contexts.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
> index d075b0241f1f5..e8bbfc376ebb1 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -971,7 +972,7 @@ static int ctr_paes_do_crypt(struct s390_paes_ctx *ctx,
> if (rc)
> goto out;
>
> - locked = mutex_trylock(&ctrblk_lock);
> + locked = down_trylock(&ctrblk_sem) == 0;
[Severity: High]
This isn't a bug introduced by this patch, but does the same fix need to be
applied to the standard AES CTR implementation in
arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c?
Looking at ctr_aes_crypt() in that file, it uses the exact same locking
pattern:
arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c:ctr_aes_crypt() {
...
locked = mutex_trylock(&ctrblk_lock);
...
if (locked)
mutex_unlock(&ctrblk_lock);
...
}
Since skcipher algorithms can be called from atomic or softirq contexts
during operations like ipsec network packet processing, could this similarly
trigger a panic or lockdep warning?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260817104203.74033-1-freude@linux.ibm.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 10:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-17 10:41 [PATCH v2 0/6] Fixes and rework for paes_s390 Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] s390/crypto: Fix return code handling at skcipher_walk_done in PAES algorithms Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 11:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 10:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] s390/crypto: Fix missing scrub of temp buffers with PAES algorithm Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:52 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] s390/crypto: Fix use of mutex in atomic context in PAES Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:50 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-17 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] s390/crypto: Fix missing cra_flags in paes_s390 Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] s390/crypto: Fix handling of EBUSY in PAES when req is pushed to crypto engine Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] s390/crypto: Fix handling of EBUSY in PHMAC " Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:56 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260817105059.658DF1F00A3A@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox