From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Harald Freudenberger" <freude@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] s390/crypto: Fix missing scrub of temp buffers with PAES algorithm
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2026 10:52:43 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260817105244.599641F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260817104203.74033-3-freude@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Medium] Missing memory scrub on stack temporary bounce buffer in `ctr_aes_crypt()`.
- [Medium] Missing memory scrub on stack bounce buffers in `gcm_aes_crypt()`.
--
--- Patch [2]: [PATCH v2 2/6] s390/crypto: Fix missing scrub of temp buffers with PAES algorithm ---
commit 517f415eda900d45f7871a3da2f51b851e06642f
Author: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
s390/crypto: Fix missing scrub of temp buffers with PAES algorithm
This patch explicitly scrubs the stack bounce buffer used for partial block
processing in ctr_paes_do_crypt(). It also updates __xts_2keys_prep_param()
to scrub the entire pcc_param structure rather than just the key field,
preventing inadvertent exposure of sensitive cryptographic material.
> diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
> index ccc7da106c3a0..d075b0241f1f5 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c
> @@ -1044,6 +1044,7 @@ static int ctr_paes_do_crypt(struct s390_paes_ctx *ctx,
> }
>
> out:
> + memzero_explicit(buf, sizeof(buf));
[Severity: Medium]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does ctr_aes_crypt() in
arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c have the same missing scrub on its temporary
bounce buffer?
Like the PAES algorithm fixed here, intermediate cryptographic data
appears to be left on the kernel stack when an AES-CTR operation
processes a final partial block that is not a multiple of AES_BLOCK_SIZE:
arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c:ctr_aes_crypt() {
...
if (nbytes) {
memset(buf, 0, AES_BLOCK_SIZE);
memcpy(buf, walk.src.virt.addr, nbytes);
cpacf_kmctr(sctx->fc, sctx->key, buf, buf,
AES_BLOCK_SIZE, walk.iv);
memcpy(walk.dst.virt.addr, buf, nbytes);
crypto_inc(walk.iv, AES_BLOCK_SIZE);
ret = skcipher_walk_done(&walk, 0);
}
return ret;
}
> pr_debug("rc=%d\n", rc);
> return rc;
> }
> @@ -1377,7 +1378,7 @@ static inline int __xts_2keys_prep_param(struct s390_pxts_ctx *ctx,
> memcpy(param->init, pcc_param.xts, 16);
> }
>
> - memzero_explicit(pcc_param.key, sizeof(pcc_param.key));
> + memzero_explicit(&pcc_param, sizeof(pcc_param));
[Severity: Medium]
This is also a pre-existing issue, but does gcm_aes_crypt() in
arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c also need its stack bounce buffers scrubbed?
It explicitly scrubs the param structure, but seems to omit scrubbing
gw_in and gw_out. This leaves intermediate cryptographic data on the stack
when an AES-GCM operation with scattered or unaligned data uses the internal
bounce buffers:
arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c:gcm_aes_crypt() {
...
struct gcm_sg_walk gw_in, gw_out;
...
memzero_explicit(¶m, sizeof(param));
return ret;
}
> return rc;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260817104203.74033-1-freude@linux.ibm.com?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-17 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-17 10:41 [PATCH v2 0/6] Fixes and rework for paes_s390 Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:41 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] s390/crypto: Fix return code handling at skcipher_walk_done in PAES algorithms Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 11:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 10:41 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] s390/crypto: Fix missing scrub of temp buffers with PAES algorithm Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:52 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-17 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] s390/crypto: Fix use of mutex in atomic context in PAES Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] s390/crypto: Fix missing cra_flags in paes_s390 Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] s390/crypto: Fix handling of EBUSY in PAES when req is pushed to crypto engine Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:58 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-17 10:42 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] s390/crypto: Fix handling of EBUSY in PHMAC " Harald Freudenberger
2026-08-17 10:56 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260817105244.599641F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox