Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	Andreas Grapentin <gra@linux.ibm.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
	Friedrich Welter <fritz@linux.ibm.com>,
	Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>, Gautam Gala <ggala@linux.ibm.com>,
	Hariharan Mari <hari55@linux.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>,
	Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>,
	Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <oss@nina.schoetterlglausch.eu>,
	Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	Ulrich Weigand <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>,
	Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/20] KVM: arm64: Share more arm64 code with s390
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 16:55:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831145536.913567-8-seiden@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831145536.913567-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com>

Mark functions that s390 can use to implement arm on s390 as shared
functions.

Signed-off-by: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c      |  3 +++
 arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c    | 11 +++++++----
 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
index 6b92a3c1d490..62e8b32ee74e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
@@ -340,6 +340,7 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
 	kvm_arm_teardown_hypercalls(kvm);
 }
 
+#ifdef ARM64_S390_COMMON
 static bool kvm_has_full_ptr_auth(void)
 {
 	bool apa, gpa, api, gpi, apa3, gpa3;
@@ -374,6 +375,8 @@ static bool kvm_has_full_ptr_auth(void)
 		(apa + api + apa3) == 1);
 }
 
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
 int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
 {
 	int r;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
index 6ca5a9f357cd..e978b2fbeb76 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
@@ -307,12 +307,12 @@ static int set_core_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
 	return err;
 }
 
-#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
-
 #define vq_word(vq) (((vq) - SVE_VQ_MIN) / 64)
 #define vq_mask(vq) ((u64)1 << ((vq) - SVE_VQ_MIN) % 64)
 #define vq_present(vqs, vq) (!!((vqs)[vq_word(vq)] & vq_mask(vq)))
 
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
 static int get_sve_vls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
 {
 	unsigned int max_vq, vq;
@@ -383,6 +383,7 @@ static int set_sve_vls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#ifdef ARM64_S390_COMMON
 #define SVE_REG_SLICE_SHIFT	0
 #define SVE_REG_SLICE_BITS	5
 #define SVE_REG_ID_SHIFT	(SVE_REG_SLICE_SHIFT + SVE_REG_SLICE_BITS)
@@ -399,6 +400,8 @@ static int set_sve_vls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_one_reg *reg)
 #define KVM_SVE_ZREG_SIZE KVM_REG_SIZE(KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_ZREG(0, 0))
 #define KVM_SVE_PREG_SIZE KVM_REG_SIZE(KVM_REG_ARM64_SVE_PREG(0, 0))
 
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
 /*
  * Number of register slices required to cover each whole SVE register.
  * NOTE: Only the first slice every exists, for now.
@@ -595,8 +598,6 @@ static unsigned long num_core_regs(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return copy_core_reg_indices(vcpu, NULL);
 }
 
-#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
-
 static unsigned long num_sve_regs(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	const unsigned int slices = vcpu_sve_slices(vcpu);
@@ -658,6 +659,8 @@ static int copy_sve_reg_indices(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return num_regs;
 }
 
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
 /**
  * kvm_arm_num_regs - how many registers do we present via KVM_GET_ONE_REG
  * @vcpu: the vCPU pointer
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 53d096803d9d..b167f9d06fd4 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
  * 64bit interface.
  */
 
+#ifdef ARM64_S390_COMMON
 static u64 sys_reg_to_index(const struct sys_reg_desc *reg);
 static int set_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
 		      u64 val);
@@ -82,6 +83,8 @@ static bool write_to_read_only(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			"sys_reg write to read-only register");
 }
 
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
 enum sr_loc_attr {
 	SR_LOC_MEMORY	= 0,	  /* Register definitely in memory */
 	SR_LOC_LOADED	= BIT(0), /* Register on CPU, unless it cannot */
@@ -428,6 +431,7 @@ void vcpu_write_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val, enum vcpu_sysreg reg)
 	__vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, reg, val);
 }
 
+#ifdef ARM64_S390_COMMON
 /* CSSELR values; used to index KVM_REG_ARM_DEMUX_ID_CCSIDR */
 #define CSSELR_MAX 14
 
@@ -533,6 +537,8 @@ static bool access_rw(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return true;
 }
 
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
 /*
  * See note at ARMv7 ARM B1.14.4 (TL;DR: S/W ops are not easily virtualized).
  */
@@ -800,6 +806,7 @@ static bool access_gicv5_ppi_enabler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return true;
 }
 
+#ifdef ARM64_S390_COMMON
 static bool trap_raz_wi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
@@ -853,6 +860,8 @@ static bool trap_oslsr_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return true;
 }
 
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
 static int set_oslsr_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
 			 u64 val)
 {
@@ -1011,6 +1020,7 @@ static u64 reset_actlr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 	return actlr;
 }
 
+#ifdef ARM64_S390_COMMON
 static u64 reset_mpidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	u64 mpidr = kvm_calculate_mpidr(vcpu);
@@ -1019,6 +1029,8 @@ static u64 reset_mpidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 	return mpidr;
 }
 
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
 static unsigned int hidden_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 				      const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
@@ -1922,6 +1934,7 @@ static u8 pmuver_to_perfmon(u8 pmuver)
 	}
 }
 
+#ifdef ARM64_S390_COMMON
 static u64 sanitise_id_aa64pfr0_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
 static u64 sanitise_id_aa64pfr1_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
 static u64 sanitise_id_aa64pfr2_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
@@ -2078,6 +2091,8 @@ static bool access_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return true;
 }
 
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
 static unsigned int aa32_id_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 				       const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
@@ -2127,6 +2142,7 @@ static unsigned int fp8_visibility(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return REG_HIDDEN;
 }
 
+#ifdef ARM64_S390_COMMON
 static u64 sanitise_id_aa64pfr0_el1(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
 {
 	if (!vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
@@ -2288,6 +2304,8 @@ static int set_id_aa64dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, val);
 }
 
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
 static u64 read_sanitised_id_dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 				      const struct sys_reg_desc *rd)
 {
@@ -2332,6 +2350,7 @@ static int set_id_dfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	return set_id_reg(vcpu, rd, val);
 }
 
+#ifdef ARM64_S390_COMMON
 static int set_id_aa64pfr0_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			       const struct sys_reg_desc *rd, u64 user_val)
 {
@@ -2661,6 +2680,8 @@ static bool access_ccsidr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
 	return true;
 }
 
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
 static int get_raz_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *rd,
 		       u64 *val)
 {
@@ -2764,6 +2785,7 @@ static bool bad_redir_trap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	SYS_REG_USER_FILTER(name, access_arch_timer, reset_val, 0, \
 			    arch_timer_get_user, arch_timer_set_user, vis)
 
+#ifdef ARM64_S390_COMMON
 /*
  * Since reset() callback and field val are not used for idregs, they will be
  * used for specific purposes for idregs.
@@ -2840,6 +2862,8 @@ static bool bad_redir_trap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	.val = 0,				\
 }
 
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
 static bool access_sp_el1(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 			  struct sys_reg_params *p,
 			  const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
@@ -3212,6 +3236,7 @@ static void init_imp_id_regs(void)
 	boot_cpu_aidr_val = read_sysreg(aidr_el1);
 }
 
+#ifdef ARM64_S390_COMMON
 static u64 reset_imp_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	switch (reg_to_encoding(r)) {
@@ -3269,6 +3294,8 @@ static int set_imp_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r,
 	.val = mask,					\
 	}
 
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
 static u64 reset_mdcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
 {
 	__vcpu_assign_sys_reg(vcpu, r->reg, vcpu->kvm->arch.nr_pmu_counters);
@@ -4833,6 +4860,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_64_regs[] = {
 	{ SYS_DESC(SYS_AARCH32_CNTVCTSS),     access_arch_timer },
 };
 
+#ifdef ARM64_S390_COMMON
 static bool check_sysreg_table(const struct sys_reg_desc *table, unsigned int n,
 			       bool reset_check)
 {
@@ -4882,6 +4910,8 @@ static void perform_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 		kvm_incr_pc(vcpu);
 }
 
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
 /*
  * emulate_cp --  tries to match a sys_reg access in a handling table, and
  *                call the corresponding trap handler.
@@ -5340,6 +5370,7 @@ void kvm_sys_regs_create_debugfs(struct kvm *kvm)
 			    &sr_resx_fops);
 }
 
+#ifdef ARM64_S390_COMMON
 static void reset_vm_ftr_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct sys_reg_desc *reg)
 {
 	u32 id = reg_to_encoding(reg);
@@ -5360,6 +5391,8 @@ static void reset_vcpu_ftr_id_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 	reg->reset(vcpu, reg);
 }
 
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
 /**
  * kvm_reset_sys_regs - sets system registers to reset value
  * @vcpu: The VCPU pointer
@@ -5432,6 +5465,7 @@ int kvm_handle_sys_reg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 	return 1;
 }
 
+#ifdef ARM64_S390_COMMON
 /******************************************************************************
  * Userspace API
  *****************************************************************************/
@@ -5753,6 +5787,8 @@ int kvm_arm_copy_sys_reg_indices(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 __user *uindices)
 	return write_demux_regids(uindices);
 }
 
+#endif /* ARM64_S390_COMMON */
+
 #define KVM_ARM_FEATURE_ID_RANGE_INDEX(r)			\
 	KVM_ARM_FEATURE_ID_RANGE_IDX(sys_reg_Op0(r),		\
 		sys_reg_Op1(r),					\
-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-08-31 15:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-31 14:55 [PATCH v2 00/20] KVM: arm64 on s390 System Register Handling Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] KVM: arm64: Refactor idreg caching into dedicated structure Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] KVM: arm64: Extract number of sys_reg_desc into a constant Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] arm64: sysreg: Define OSLSR_EL1_OSLK_MASK Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] arm64: Share more arm64 headers with s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Prepare for sharing more arm64 code Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] KVM: arm64: Prepare sys_regs.c for sharing with s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` Steffen Eiden [this message]
2026-08-31 19:01   ` [PATCH v2 07/20] KVM: arm64: Share more arm64 code " sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] s390: tools: Allow sharing arm64/kvm headers Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 19:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] s390: Introduce read/write ARM sysreg instructions Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 19:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] s390: Add functions to query arm guest time Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 19:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Query Available Arm features Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 19:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement feature sanitisation Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 20:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement arm sysreg managing infrastructure Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 20:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Integrate sysreg into the host Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 21:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Use QAAF init save area Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 21:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement exception injection Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 21:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Finalize page fault handling Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 21:52   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement SVE for arm guests Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Promote PTRAUTH capability Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] s390: Report AEF features to sysfs Steffen Eiden

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260831145536.913567-8-seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=brueckner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=david@kernel.org \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=fritz@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=ggala@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gra@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hari55@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=iii@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=oss@nina.schoetterlglausch.eu \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox