Linux s390 Architecture development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Steffen Eiden" <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Finalize page fault handling
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 21:52:41 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831215242.5B6971F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831145536.913567-18-seiden@linux.ibm.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:

Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Architectural Violation: Injected aborts incorrectly set the ESR_ELx_IL bit conditionally.
--

commit b703e320efef81f7ebb0637eda7231ef63b3ca22
Author: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>

KVM: s390: arm64: Finalize page fault handling

This commit finalizes page fault handling by replacing temporary error
returns with proper ARM64 exception injection. Specifically, it routes
PGM_ADDRESSING faults and out-of-bounds IPAs to kvm_inject_size_fault()
and kvm_inject_sea().

> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/arm64/mmu.c b/arch/s390/kvm/arm64/mmu.c
> index bf3442d3609b2..b5f1dc3ca0d28 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/arm64/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/arm64/mmu.c
> @@ -30,12 +30,14 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t fault_ipa,
>  	ret = kvm_s390_faultin_gfn(vcpu, NULL, &f);
>  	if (ret <= 0)
>  		return ret;
> -	if (ret == PGM_ADDRESSING)
> +	if (ret == PGM_ADDRESSING) {
>  		/*
> -		 * Without the relevant sysregs we cannot do anything for now.
> -		 * Go back to userspace with an error. TODO sysreg handling
> +		 * There is no page with the requested address. Inject size fault
> +		 * which is the closest arm match to PGM-addressing
>  		 */
> -		return -ENOEXEC;
> +		kvm_inject_size_fault(vcpu);

[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but does routing faults to
kvm_inject_size_fault() expose an architectural violation for 16-bit
instructions?

When a guest user-space process executing a 16-bit instruction triggers a
fault, this patch routes it to the exception injection logic. That logic
currently conditionally sets the IL bit based on instruction length:

arch/s390/kvm/arm64/inject_fault.c:inject_abt64() {
    ...
    if (kvm_vcpu_trap_il_is32bit(vcpu))
        esr |= ESR_ELx_IL;
    ...
}

(The same conditional logic is also present in kvm_inject_undefined()).

For an SError, Instruction Abort, or Data Abort with ISV == 0, the
architecture mandates that the IL bit must be 1 regardless of the trapping
instruction's length. 

Could this cause KVM to synthesize an ESR_ELx with IL=0 instead of the
required IL=1 for 16-bit instructions? If the guest OS exception handler
receives an architecturally invalid syndrome, could it malfunction or lead to
a guest kernel panic?

> +		return 1;
> +	}
>  	KVM_BUG_ON(ret, vcpu->kvm);
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831145536.913567-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com?part=17

  reply	other threads:[~2026-08-31 21:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-31 14:55 [PATCH v2 00/20] KVM: arm64 on s390 System Register Handling Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 01/20] KVM: arm64: Refactor idreg caching into dedicated structure Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:06   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 02/20] KVM: arm64: Extract number of sys_reg_desc into a constant Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 03/20] arm64: sysreg: Define OSLSR_EL1_OSLK_MASK Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:18   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 04/20] arm64: Share more arm64 headers with s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 05/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Prepare for sharing more arm64 code Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 06/20] KVM: arm64: Prepare sys_regs.c for sharing with s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 07/20] KVM: arm64: Share more arm64 code " Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 19:01   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 08/20] s390: tools: Allow sharing arm64/kvm headers Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 19:03   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 09/20] s390: Introduce read/write ARM sysreg instructions Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 19:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 10/20] s390: Add functions to query arm guest time Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 19:24   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 11/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Query Available Arm features Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 19:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 12/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement feature sanitisation Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 20:11   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 13/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement arm sysreg managing infrastructure Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 20:33   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 14/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Integrate sysreg into the host Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 21:15   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 15/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Use QAAF init save area Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 21:32   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 16/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement exception injection Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 21:38   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 17/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Finalize page fault handling Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 21:52   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 18/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement SVE for arm guests Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 22:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 19/20] KVM: s390: arm64: Promote PTRAUTH capability Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 22:35   ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:55 ` [PATCH v2 20/20] s390: Report AEF features to sysfs Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 22:43   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260831215242.5B6971F00A3D@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox