From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Steffen Eiden" <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, "Marc Zyngier" <maz@kernel.org>,
kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Oliver Upton" <oupton@kernel.org>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/23] vfio: Use file-based reference counting for KVM
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2026 18:16:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260831181653.547C31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831144802.834315-2-seiden@linux.ibm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [Critical] Unconditional error-path clearing of `device->kvm` in `vfio_df_ioctl_bind_iommufd` causes Use-After-Free of KVM VM file.
--
commit 17abe1f20f0f7d26badf30ce42a340a4d82f7c46
Author: Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>
vfio: Use file-based reference counting for KVM
Replace manual module reference counting with file-based reference
counting for KVM integration. Previously, VFIO used symbol_get() to
obtain function pointers for kvm_get_kvm_safe() and kvm_put_kvm(),
then manually tracked module references through these symbols. This
approach required storing the put_kvm function pointer in each device
and carefully managing symbol references. Remove the put_kvm field in
struct vfio_device as is it no longer used.
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> index 423ead48aafe3..ed96acfa86358 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_main.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -511,14 +489,7 @@ void vfio_device_put_kvm(struct vfio_device *device)
> if (!device->kvm)
> return;
>
> - if (WARN_ON(!device->put_kvm))
> - goto clear;
> -
> - device->put_kvm(device->kvm);
> - device->put_kvm = NULL;
> - symbol_put(kvm_put_kvm);
> -
> -clear:
> + fput(device->kvm);
> device->kvm = NULL;
> }
[Severity: Critical]
This is a pre-existing issue, but looking at how this function is called
from the error path in vfio_df_ioctl_bind_iommufd(), could this cause a
use-after-free of the KVM VM file?
If a process opens a VFIO cdev (df1) and successfully binds it via
VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD, device->kvm is set to the KVM file and
device->open_count is 1.
If the process then opens a second cdev fd (df2) for the same device and
calls VFIO_DEVICE_BIND_IOMMUFD again without associating a KVM VM:
df2->access_granted is false, bypassing the already bound check.
vfio_df_get_kvm_safe(df2) does nothing because df2->kvm is NULL, leaving
device->kvm intact.
vfio_df_open(df2) then fails because the device is already open
(device->open_count != 0).
The error path in vfio_df_ioctl_bind_iommufd() then unconditionally drops
the KVM reference:
drivers/vfio/device_cdev.c:vfio_df_ioctl_bind_iommufd() {
...
out_put_kvm:
vfio_device_put_kvm(device);
...
}
This calls fput(device->kvm) and sets device->kvm = NULL here in
vfio_device_put_kvm(), dropping the legitimate KVM reference held by df1.
When userspace subsequently closes the KVM fd, the VM is freed, but the
active VFIO driver (e.g., vfio_ap) retains a dangling pointer to it.
Could this lead to a use-after-free upon the next operation?
Should the error path in vfio_df_ioctl_bind_iommufd() avoid calling
vfio_device_put_kvm() if the failed caller wasn't the one that set
device->kvm?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260831144802.834315-1-seiden@linux.ibm.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-31 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-31 14:47 [PATCH v7 00/23] KVM: s390: Introduce arm64 KVM Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 01/23] vfio: Use file-based reference counting for KVM Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 02/23] KVM: Make device name configurable Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 03/23] KVM: Allow KVM implementations to switch off MMIO independent of Kconfig Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 04/23] arm64: Use proper include variant Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:31 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 05/23] arm64: ptrace: Use constants for compat register numbers Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 06/23] arm64: sysreg: Convert SPSR_ELx to automatic register generation Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:38 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 07/23] KVM: arm64: Access elements of vcpu_gp_regs individually Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 08/23] KVM: arm64: Use accessor functions for core regs Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:45 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 09/23] arm64: Prepare sharing arm64 headers with s390 Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 18:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 10/23] arm64: Share " Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 19:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 11/23] KVM: arm64: Share arm64 code " Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 19:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 12/23] s390/tools: Use arm64 headers Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 19:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 13/23] KVM: s390: Use arm64 code Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 19:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 14/23] KVM: s390: Prepare KVM/s390 for a second KVM module Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 19:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 15/23] s390: Introduce Start Arm Execution instruction Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 20:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 16/23] KVM: s390: arm64: Introduce host definitions Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 20:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 17/23] s390/hwcaps: Report SAE support as hwcap Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 20:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 18/23] KVM: s390: Add basic arm64 kvm module Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 20:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 19/23] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement required functions Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 21:13 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 20/23] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vm/vcpu create destroy Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 21:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 21/23] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement vCPU IOCTLs Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 21:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:47 ` [PATCH v7 22/23] KVM: s390: arm64: Implement basic page fault handler Steffen Eiden
2026-08-31 22:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 14:48 ` [PATCH v7 23/23] KVM: s390: arm64: Add KVM_S390_ARM64 Kconfig and Makefile Steffen Eiden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260831181653.547C31F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox