From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: "Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
Cc: KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
QingFeng Hao <haoqf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL 9/9] KVM: s390: Inject machine check into the nested guest
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 21:17:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41b84826-c286-4c41-2fe8-300e100ea60b@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18e00d40-bdd4-84a9-f1b5-d4599aac74af@de.ibm.com>
>> As mentioned in the other mail, e.g. vector register validity should
>> only be set if vector registers are enabled for the nested guest
>> (execution control enabled).
>
> Yes, but sInce we inject in the base guest (non-nested) we have to check the base guest
> execution control.
>
Right, confusion due to nesting levels strikes again :)
--
Thanks,
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-28 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-28 17:30 [GIT PULL 0/9] KVM: s390: fixes and features for 4.13 (via kvm/next) Christian Borntraeger
2017-06-28 17:30 ` [GIT PULL 1/9] KVM: s390: CMMA tracking, ESSA emulation, migration mode Christian Borntraeger
2017-06-28 17:30 ` [GIT PULL 2/9] KVM: s390: ioctls to get and set guest storage attributes Christian Borntraeger
2017-06-28 17:30 ` [GIT PULL 3/9] KVM: s390: implement instruction execution protection for emulated ifetch Christian Borntraeger
2017-06-28 17:30 ` [GIT PULL 4/9] KVM: S390: add new group for flic Christian Borntraeger
2017-06-28 17:30 ` [GIT PULL 5/9] KVM: s390: avoid packed attribute Christian Borntraeger
2017-06-28 17:30 ` [GIT PULL 6/9] s390/nmi: s390: New low level handling for machine check happening in guest Christian Borntraeger
2017-06-28 17:30 ` [GIT PULL 7/9] KVM: s390: Backup the guest's machine check info Christian Borntraeger
2017-06-28 18:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-06-28 18:37 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-06-28 18:56 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-06-28 19:14 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-06-28 19:46 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-06-28 17:30 ` [GIT PULL 8/9] KVM: s390: Inject machine check into the guest Christian Borntraeger
2017-06-28 17:30 ` [GIT PULL 9/9] KVM: s390: Inject machine check into the nested guest Christian Borntraeger
2017-06-28 18:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-06-28 18:59 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-06-28 19:08 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-06-28 19:16 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-06-28 19:17 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2017-06-29 14:57 ` Christian Borntraeger
2017-06-30 16:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2017-06-28 20:39 ` [GIT PULL 0/9] KVM: s390: fixes and features for 4.13 (via kvm/next) Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41b84826-c286-4c41-2fe8-300e100ea60b@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=haoqf@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox