From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>,
Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
david@redhat.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: interrupt: fix virtual-physical confusion for next alert GISA
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 10:53:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <613ce5d8-2ef4-6cf0-223c-98c9ef987551@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b03e447f-6f49-cdd0-1b8a-b27f63aa6bae@linux.ibm.com>
On 3/7/23 14:53, Michael Mueller wrote:
>
>
> On 23.02.23 17:22, Nico Boehr wrote:
>> We sometimes put a virtual address in next_alert, which should always be
>> a physical address, since it is shared with hardware.
>>
>> This currently works, because virtual and physical addresses are
>> the same.
>>
>> Add phys_to_virt() to resolve the virtual-physical confusion.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 4 ++--
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> index ab26aa53ee37..20743c5b000a 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static inline u8 gisa_get_ipm_or_restore_iam(struct kvm_s390_gisa_interrupt *gi)
>>
>> static inline int gisa_in_alert_list(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa)
>> {
>> - return READ_ONCE(gisa->next_alert) != (u32)(u64)gisa;
>> + return READ_ONCE(gisa->next_alert) != (u32)virt_to_phys(gisa);
>> }
>>
>> static inline void gisa_set_ipm_gisc(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u32 gisc)
>> @@ -3167,7 +3167,7 @@ void kvm_s390_gisa_init(struct kvm *kvm)
>> hrtimer_init(&gi->timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
>> gi->timer.function = gisa_vcpu_kicker;
>> memset(gi->origin, 0, sizeof(struct kvm_s390_gisa));
>> - gi->origin->next_alert = (u32)(u64)gi->origin;
>> + gi->origin->next_alert = (u32)virt_to_phys(gi->origin);
>> VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "gisa 0x%pK initialized", gi->origin);
>> }
>>
>
> Here is my
>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
After a consultation with Michael I'm now a 100% sure this is a rev-by
and not a s-o-b. I've picked the patch with his rev-by.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-08 9:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-23 16:22 [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: interrupt: fix virtual-physical confusion for next alert GISA Nico Boehr
2023-02-24 10:31 ` Janosch Frank
2023-03-07 13:53 ` Michael Mueller
2023-03-08 9:53 ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2023-03-08 10:23 ` Michael Mueller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=613ce5d8-2ef4-6cf0-223c-98c9ef987551@linux.ibm.com \
--to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox