public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>,
	Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
	borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
	david@redhat.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: interrupt: fix virtual-physical confusion for next alert GISA
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 10:53:48 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <613ce5d8-2ef4-6cf0-223c-98c9ef987551@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b03e447f-6f49-cdd0-1b8a-b27f63aa6bae@linux.ibm.com>

On 3/7/23 14:53, Michael Mueller wrote:
> 
> 
> On 23.02.23 17:22, Nico Boehr wrote:
>> We sometimes put a virtual address in next_alert, which should always be
>> a physical address, since it is shared with hardware.
>>
>> This currently works, because virtual and physical addresses are
>> the same.
>>
>> Add phys_to_virt() to resolve the virtual-physical confusion.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>    arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 4 ++--
>>    1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> index ab26aa53ee37..20743c5b000a 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
>> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static inline u8 gisa_get_ipm_or_restore_iam(struct kvm_s390_gisa_interrupt *gi)
>>    
>>    static inline int gisa_in_alert_list(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa)
>>    {
>> -	return READ_ONCE(gisa->next_alert) != (u32)(u64)gisa;
>> +	return READ_ONCE(gisa->next_alert) != (u32)virt_to_phys(gisa);
>>    }
>>    
>>    static inline void gisa_set_ipm_gisc(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u32 gisc)
>> @@ -3167,7 +3167,7 @@ void kvm_s390_gisa_init(struct kvm *kvm)
>>    	hrtimer_init(&gi->timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
>>    	gi->timer.function = gisa_vcpu_kicker;
>>    	memset(gi->origin, 0, sizeof(struct kvm_s390_gisa));
>> -	gi->origin->next_alert = (u32)(u64)gi->origin;
>> +	gi->origin->next_alert = (u32)virt_to_phys(gi->origin);
>>    	VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "gisa 0x%pK initialized", gi->origin);
>>    }
>>    
> 
> Here is my
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>

After a consultation with Michael I'm now a 100% sure this is a rev-by 
and not a s-o-b. I've picked the patch with his rev-by.



  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-08  9:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-23 16:22 [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: interrupt: fix virtual-physical confusion for next alert GISA Nico Boehr
2023-02-24 10:31 ` Janosch Frank
2023-03-07 13:53 ` Michael Mueller
2023-03-08  9:53   ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2023-03-08 10:23 ` Michael Mueller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=613ce5d8-2ef4-6cf0-223c-98c9ef987551@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox