From: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
To: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: interrupt: fix virtual-physical confusion for next alert GISA
Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 11:23:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f135ec43-2a7c-fbc7-4aab-8fb7c4b820ed@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230223162236.51569-1-nrb@linux.ibm.com>
On 23.02.23 17:22, Nico Boehr wrote:
> We sometimes put a virtual address in next_alert, which should always be
> a physical address, since it is shared with hardware.
>
> This currently works, because virtual and physical addresses are
> the same.
>
> Add phys_to_virt() to resolve the virtual-physical confusion.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nico Boehr <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> index ab26aa53ee37..20743c5b000a 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/interrupt.c
> @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ static inline u8 gisa_get_ipm_or_restore_iam(struct kvm_s390_gisa_interrupt *gi)
>
> static inline int gisa_in_alert_list(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa)
> {
> - return READ_ONCE(gisa->next_alert) != (u32)(u64)gisa;
> + return READ_ONCE(gisa->next_alert) != (u32)virt_to_phys(gisa);
> }
>
> static inline void gisa_set_ipm_gisc(struct kvm_s390_gisa *gisa, u32 gisc)
> @@ -3167,7 +3167,7 @@ void kvm_s390_gisa_init(struct kvm *kvm)
> hrtimer_init(&gi->timer, CLOCK_MONOTONIC, HRTIMER_MODE_REL);
> gi->timer.function = gisa_vcpu_kicker;
> memset(gi->origin, 0, sizeof(struct kvm_s390_gisa));
> - gi->origin->next_alert = (u32)(u64)gi->origin;
> + gi->origin->next_alert = (u32)virt_to_phys(gi->origin);
> VM_EVENT(kvm, 3, "gisa 0x%pK initialized", gi->origin);
> }
>
I ran hades tests as well. Thanks.
Here is my
Reviewed-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.ibm.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-08 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-23 16:22 [PATCH v1] KVM: s390: interrupt: fix virtual-physical confusion for next alert GISA Nico Boehr
2023-02-24 10:31 ` Janosch Frank
2023-03-07 13:53 ` Michael Mueller
2023-03-08 9:53 ` Janosch Frank
2023-03-08 10:23 ` Michael Mueller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f135ec43-2a7c-fbc7-4aab-8fb7c4b820ed@linux.ibm.com \
--to=mimu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox