public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Justin Sanders <justin@coraid.com>,
	Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
	Xianting Tian <xianting_tian@126.com>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com,
	Stefan Haberland <sth@linux.ibm.com>,
	Jan Hoeppner <hoeppner@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nbd@other.debian.org,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] block: fix locking for struct block_device size updates
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 09:36:38 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <73653f9e-2d39-48fb-9842-3a1851fb5bed@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200823091043.2600261-3-hch@lst.de>

On 8/23/20 11:10 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Two different callers use two different mutexes for updating the
> block device size, which obviously doesn't help to actually protect
> against concurrent updates from the different callers.  In addition
> one of the locks, bd_mutex is rather prone to deadlocks with other
> parts of the block stack that use it for high level synchronization.
> 
> Switch to using a new spinlock protecting just the size updates, as
> that is all we need, and make sure everyone does the update through
> the proper helper.
> 
> This fixes a bug reported with the nvme revalidating disks during a
> hot removal operation, which can currently deadlock on bd_mutex.
> 
> Reported-by: Xianting Tian <xianting_tian@126.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> ---
>  block/partitions/core.c         |  4 ++--
>  drivers/block/aoe/aoecmd.c      |  4 +---
>  drivers/md/dm.c                 | 15 ++-------------
>  drivers/s390/block/dasd_ioctl.c |  9 ++-------
>  fs/block_dev.c                  | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
>  include/linux/blk_types.h       |  1 +
>  6 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke		           Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de			                  +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: Felix Imendörffer

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-24  7:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-23  9:10 fix block device size update serialization v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-23  9:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] block: replace bd_set_size with bd_set_nr_sectors Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-24  8:25   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-23  9:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] block: fix locking for struct block_device size updates Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-24  7:36   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2020-08-24  8:26   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-23  9:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] nvme: don't call revalidate_disk from nvme_set_queue_dying Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-24  7:37   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-08-24  8:26   ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-08-27  7:47 ` fix block device size update serialization v2 Christoph Hellwig
2020-08-29 16:47   ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=73653f9e-2d39-48fb-9842-3a1851fb5bed@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=hoeppner@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=justin@coraid.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
    --cc=sth@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=xianting_tian@126.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox