From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, thuth@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/3] s390x: Load reset psw on diag308 reset
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2019 13:09:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7683adc7-2cd0-1103-d231-8a1577f1e673@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191111153345.22505-4-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
On 11.11.19 16:33, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On a diag308 subcode 0 CRs will be reset, so we need a PSW mask
> without DAT. Also we need to set the short psw indication to be
> compliant with the architecture.
>
> Let's therefore define a reset PSW mask with 64 bit addressing and
> short PSW indication that is compliant with architecture and use it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c | 1 +
> lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 3 ++-
> s390x/cstart64.S | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
> 3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c b/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
> index 4b213f8..61d2658 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm-offsets.c
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ int main(void)
> OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPRS, lowcore, sw_int_fprs);
> OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_FPC, lowcore, sw_int_fpc);
> OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_CRS, lowcore, sw_int_crs);
> + OFFSET(GEN_LC_SW_INT_PSW, lowcore, sw_int_psw);
> OFFSET(GEN_LC_MCCK_EXT_SA_ADDR, lowcore, mcck_ext_sa_addr);
> OFFSET(GEN_LC_FPRS_SA, lowcore, fprs_sa);
> OFFSET(GEN_LC_GRS_SA, lowcore, grs_sa);
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> index 07d4e5e..7d25e4f 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> @@ -79,7 +79,8 @@ struct lowcore {
> uint32_t sw_int_fpc; /* 0x0300 */
> uint8_t pad_0x0304[0x0308 - 0x0304]; /* 0x0304 */
> uint64_t sw_int_crs[16]; /* 0x0308 */
> - uint8_t pad_0x0310[0x11b0 - 0x0388]; /* 0x0388 */
> + struct psw sw_int_psw; /* 0x0388 */
> + uint8_t pad_0x0310[0x11b0 - 0x0390]; /* 0x0390 */
> uint64_t mcck_ext_sa_addr; /* 0x11b0 */
> uint8_t pad_0x11b8[0x1200 - 0x11b8]; /* 0x11b8 */
> uint64_t fprs_sa[16]; /* 0x1200 */
> diff --git a/s390x/cstart64.S b/s390x/cstart64.S
> index 4be20fc..86dd4c4 100644
> --- a/s390x/cstart64.S
> +++ b/s390x/cstart64.S
> @@ -126,13 +126,18 @@ memsetxc:
> .globl diag308_load_reset
> diag308_load_reset:
> SAVE_REGS
> - /* Save the first PSW word to the IPL PSW */
> + /* Backup current PSW mask, as we have to restore it on success */
> epsw %r0, %r1
> - st %r0, 0
> - /* Store the address and the bit for 31 bit addressing */
> - larl %r0, 0f
> - oilh %r0, 0x8000
> - st %r0, 0x4
> + st %r0, GEN_LC_SW_INT_PSW
> + st %r1, GEN_LC_SW_INT_PSW + 4
> + /* Load reset psw mask (short psw, 64 bit) */
> + lg %r0, reset_psw
> + /* Load the success label address */
> + larl %r1, 0f
> + /* Or it to the mask */
> + ogr %r0, %r1
> + /* Store it at the reset PSW location (real 0x0) */
> + stg %r0, 0
> /* Do the reset */
> diag %r0,%r2,0x308
> /* Failure path */
> @@ -144,7 +149,10 @@ diag308_load_reset:
> lctlg %c0, %c0, 0(%r1)
> RESTORE_REGS
> lhi %r2, 1
> - br %r14
> + larl %r0, 1f
> + stg %r0, GEN_LC_SW_INT_PSW + 8
> + lpswe GEN_LC_SW_INT_PSW
> +1: br %r14
>
> .globl smp_cpu_setup_state
> smp_cpu_setup_state:
> @@ -184,6 +192,8 @@ svc_int:
> lpswe GEN_LC_SVC_OLD_PSW
>
> .align 8
> +reset_psw:
> + .quad 0x0008000180000000
> initial_psw:
> .quad 0x0000000180000000, clear_bss_start
> pgm_int_psw:
>
This patch breaks the smp test under TCG (no clue and no time to look
into the details :) ):
timeout -k 1s --foreground 90s
/home/dhildenb/git/qemu/s390x-softmmu/qemu-system-s390x -nodefaults
-nographic -machine s390-ccw-virtio,accel=tcg -chardev stdio,id=con0
-device sclpconsole,chardev=con0 -kernel s390x/smp.elf -smp 1 -smp 2 #
-initrd /tmp/tmp.EDi4y0tv58
SMP: Initializing, found 2 cpus
PASS: smp: start
PASS: smp: stop
FAIL: smp: stop store status: prefix
PASS: smp: stop store status: stack
PASS: smp: store status at address: running: incorrect state
PASS: smp: store status at address: running: status not written
PASS: smp: store status at address: stopped: status written
PASS: smp: ecall: ecall
PASS: smp: emcall: ecall
PASS: smp: cpu reset: cpu stopped
PASS: smp: reset initial: clear: psw
PASS: smp: reset initial: clear: prefix
PASS: smp: reset initial: clear: fpc
PASS: smp: reset initial: clear: cpu timer
PASS: smp: reset initial: clear: todpr
PASS: smp: reset initial: initialized: cr0 == 0xE0
PASS: smp: reset initial: initialized: cr14 == 0xC2000000
PASS: smp: reset initial: cpu stopped
SUMMARY: 18 tests, 1 unexpected failures
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-12 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-11 15:33 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/3] s390x: Improve architectural compliance for diag308 Janosch Frank
2019-11-11 15:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 1/3] s390x: Fix initial cr0 load comments Janosch Frank
2019-11-12 9:25 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-11 15:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 2/3] s390x: Add CR save area Janosch Frank
2019-11-11 17:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-12 9:41 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-11 15:33 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 3/3] s390x: Load reset psw on diag308 reset Janosch Frank
2019-11-12 9:53 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-12 12:09 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2019-11-12 13:42 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-12 16:17 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-13 10:04 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-13 10:31 ` Thomas Huth
2019-11-13 11:24 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v4] " Janosch Frank
2019-11-13 18:06 ` David Hildenbrand
2019-11-14 7:24 ` Janosch Frank
2019-11-12 13:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3] " Janosch Frank
2019-11-12 12:10 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/3] s390x: Improve architectural compliance for diag308 David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7683adc7-2cd0-1103-d231-8a1577f1e673@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox