From: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
schnelle@linux.ibm.com, farman@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, hca@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com,
gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
frankja@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, imbrenda@linux.ibm.com,
vneethv@linux.ibm.com, oberpar@linux.ibm.com,
freude@linux.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 17/30] KVM: s390: mechanism to enable guest zPCI Interpretation
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 10:28:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7a1fa398-3304-cb30-10c0-83e12ac9e8ac@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7125d611-5440-09ae-429a-7a087dd77868@linux.ibm.com>
On 1/24/22 9:24 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>
>
> On 1/14/22 21:31, Matthew Rosato wrote:
>> The guest must have access to certain facilities in order to allow
>> interpretive execution of zPCI instructions and adapter event
>> notifications. However, there are some cases where a guest might
>> disable interpretation -- provide a mechanism via which we can defer
>> enabling the associated zPCI interpretation facilities until the guest
>> indicates it wishes to use them.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 4 ++++
>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.h | 10 ++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 3f147b8d050b..38982c1de413 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -252,7 +252,10 @@ struct kvm_s390_sie_block {
>> #define ECB2_IEP 0x20
>> #define ECB2_PFMFI 0x08
>> #define ECB2_ESCA 0x04
>> +#define ECB2_ZPCI_LSI 0x02
>> __u8 ecb2; /* 0x0062 */
>> +#define ECB3_AISI 0x20
>> +#define ECB3_AISII 0x10
>> #define ECB3_DEA 0x08
>> #define ECB3_AES 0x04
>> #define ECB3_RI 0x01
>> @@ -938,6 +941,7 @@ struct kvm_arch{
>> int use_cmma;
>> int use_pfmfi;
>> int use_skf;
>> + int use_zpci_interp;
>> int user_cpu_state_ctrl;
>> int user_sigp;
>> int user_stsi;
>> diff --git a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> index ab8b56deed11..b6c32fc3b272 100644
>> --- a/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> +++ b/arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c
>> @@ -1029,6 +1029,44 @@ static int kvm_s390_vm_set_crypto(struct kvm
>> *kvm, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +static void kvm_s390_vcpu_pci_setup(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + /* Only set the ECB bits after guest requests zPCI interpretation */
>> + if (!vcpu->kvm->arch.use_zpci_interp)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb2 |= ECB2_ZPCI_LSI;
>> + vcpu->arch.sie_block->ecb3 |= ECB3_AISII + ECB3_AISI;
>
> As far as I understood, the interpretation is only possible if a gisa
> designation is associated with the PCI function via CLP enable.
>
This is true. Once ECB is enabled, you must have either a SHM bit on
for emulated device support or SHM bits off + a GISA designation
registered for interpretation. Otherwise, PCI instructions will fail.
> Why do we setup the SIE ECB only when the guest requests for
> interpretation and not systematically in vcpu_setup?
Once the ECB is enabled for a guest, emulated device FHs must have a SHM
bit in order to continue working properly (so do passthrough devices
that don't setup interpretation). This was not a requirement before
this series -- simply having the ECB bit off would ensure intercepts for
all devices regardless of SHM bit settings, so by doing an opt-in once
the guest indicates it will be doing interpretation we can preserve
backwards-compatibility with an initial mode where SHM bits are not
necessarily required. However once userspace indicates it understands
interpretation, we can assume it is will also use SHM bits properly.
>
> If ECB2_ZPCI_LSI, ECB3_AISII or ECB3_AISI have an effect when the gisa
> designation is not specified shouldn't we have a way to clear these bits?
>
I'm not sure that's necessary -- The idea here was for the userspace to
indicate 1) that it knows how to setup for interpreted devices and 2)
that it has a guest that wants to use at least 1 interpreted device.
Once we know that userspace understands how to manage interpreted
devices (implied by its use of these new vfio feature ioctls) I think it
should be OK to leave these bits on and expect userspace to always do
the appropriate steps (SHM bits for emulated devices / forced intercept
passthrough devices, GISA designation for interpreted devices).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-24 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-14 20:31 [PATCH v2 00/30] KVM: s390: enable zPCI for interpretive execution Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 01/30] s390/sclp: detect the zPCI load/store interpretation facility Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 02/30] s390/sclp: detect the AISII facility Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 03/30] s390/sclp: detect the AENI facility Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 04/30] s390/sclp: detect the AISI facility Matthew Rosato
2022-01-17 7:57 ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 05/30] s390/airq: pass more TPI info to airq handlers Matthew Rosato
2022-01-17 8:27 ` Thomas Huth
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 06/30] s390/airq: allow for airq structure that uses an input vector Matthew Rosato
2022-01-17 12:29 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-01-18 18:52 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-18 9:50 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 07/30] s390/pci: externalize the SIC operation controls and routine Matthew Rosato
2022-01-17 16:19 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-01-26 10:07 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-01-27 9:57 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 08/30] s390/pci: stash associated GISA designation Matthew Rosato
2022-01-24 14:08 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-24 15:12 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 09/30] s390/pci: export some routines related to RPCIT processing Matthew Rosato
2022-01-18 9:51 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 10/30] s390/pci: stash dtsm and maxstbl Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 11/30] s390/pci: add helper function to find device by handle Matthew Rosato
2022-01-18 9:53 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 12/30] s390/pci: get SHM information from list pci Matthew Rosato
2022-01-18 10:36 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-26 10:13 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-01-27 13:41 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-27 15:14 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-27 10:29 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 13/30] s390/pci: return status from zpci_refresh_trans Matthew Rosato
2022-01-19 18:13 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-26 10:45 ` Claudio Imbrenda
2022-01-27 10:30 ` Niklas Schnelle
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 14/30] KVM: s390: pci: add basic kvm_zdev structure Matthew Rosato
2022-01-17 16:25 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-18 17:32 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-18 18:39 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 15/30] KVM: s390: pci: do initial setup for AEN interpretation Matthew Rosato
2022-01-19 18:06 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-19 20:19 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-25 12:23 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-25 14:57 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 16/30] KVM: s390: pci: enable host forwarding of Adapter Event Notifications Matthew Rosato
2022-01-17 17:38 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-18 17:25 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 17/30] KVM: s390: mechanism to enable guest zPCI Interpretation Matthew Rosato
2022-01-24 14:24 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-24 15:28 ` Matthew Rosato [this message]
2022-01-24 17:15 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 18/30] KVM: s390: pci: provide routines for enabling/disabling interpretation Matthew Rosato
2022-01-24 14:36 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-24 15:14 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 19/30] KVM: s390: pci: provide routines for enabling/disabling interrupt forwarding Matthew Rosato
2022-01-25 12:41 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-25 15:44 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 20/30] KVM: s390: pci: provide routines for enabling/disabling IOAT assist Matthew Rosato
2022-01-25 13:29 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-25 14:47 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-26 8:30 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 21/30] KVM: s390: pci: handle refresh of PCI translations Matthew Rosato
2022-01-19 9:29 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-19 16:39 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-19 18:25 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-19 20:02 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-20 9:47 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 22/30] KVM: s390: intercept the rpcit instruction Matthew Rosato
2022-01-18 11:05 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-18 17:27 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-18 17:54 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-19 14:06 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 23/30] vfio/pci: re-introduce CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_ZDEV Matthew Rosato
2022-01-18 17:20 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-18 17:32 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-18 17:45 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-18 18:05 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 24/30] vfio-pci/zdev: wire up group notifier Matthew Rosato
2022-01-18 17:34 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-18 18:37 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 25/30] vfio-pci/zdev: wire up zPCI interpretive execution support Matthew Rosato
2022-01-25 13:01 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-25 14:21 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 26/30] vfio-pci/zdev: wire up zPCI adapter interrupt forwarding support Matthew Rosato
2022-01-19 17:10 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-19 17:20 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-25 12:36 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-25 14:16 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-01-26 8:24 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 27/30] vfio-pci/zdev: wire up zPCI IOAT assist support Matthew Rosato
2022-01-19 14:03 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 28/30] vfio-pci/zdev: add DTSM to clp group capability Matthew Rosato
2022-01-19 13:48 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 29/30] KVM: s390: introduce CPU feature for zPCI Interpretation Matthew Rosato
2022-01-19 13:39 ` Pierre Morel
2022-01-14 20:31 ` [PATCH v2 30/30] MAINTAINERS: additional files related kvm s390 pci passthrough Matthew Rosato
2022-01-14 20:49 ` [PATCH v2 00/30] KVM: s390: enable zPCI for interpretive execution Matthew Rosato
2022-01-19 18:10 ` Pierre Morel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7a1fa398-3304-cb30-10c0-83e12ac9e8ac@linux.ibm.com \
--to=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=schnelle@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=thuth@redhat.com \
--cc=vneethv@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox