* Re: [PATCH] bitmap: Fix optimization of bitmap_set/clear for big-endian machines
@ 2017-10-25 12:11 Matthew Wilcox
2017-11-03 2:57 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2017-10-25 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Ellerman, Paul Mackerras, Matthew Wilcox, Linus Torvalds,
linux-kernel, linux-s390
(I don't think I can reliably send patches from outlook; sorry for
breaking the threading)
I see where we're not incrementing the failure count ... try this patch!
--- 8< ---
Subject: Fix bitmap optimisation tests to report errors correctly
From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
I had neglected to increment the error counter when the tests failed,
which made the tests noisy when they fail, but not actually return an
error code.
Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
diff --git a/lib/test_bitmap.c b/lib/test_bitmap.c
index aa1f2669bdd5..ae8a830e4e54 100644
--- a/lib/test_bitmap.c
+++ b/lib/test_bitmap.c
@@ -430,23 +430,32 @@ static void noinline __init test_mem_optimisations(void)
unsigned int start, nbits;
for (start = 0; start < 1024; start += 8) {
- memset(bmap1, 0x5a, sizeof(bmap1));
- memset(bmap2, 0x5a, sizeof(bmap2));
for (nbits = 0; nbits < 1024 - start; nbits += 8) {
+ memset(bmap1, 0x5a, sizeof(bmap1));
+ memset(bmap2, 0x5a, sizeof(bmap2));
+
bitmap_set(bmap1, start, nbits);
__bitmap_set(bmap2, start, nbits);
- if (!bitmap_equal(bmap1, bmap2, 1024))
+ if (!bitmap_equal(bmap1, bmap2, 1024)) {
printk("set not equal %d %d\n", start, nbits);
- if (!__bitmap_equal(bmap1, bmap2, 1024))
+ failed_tests++;
+ }
+ if (!__bitmap_equal(bmap1, bmap2, 1024)) {
printk("set not __equal %d %d\n", start, nbits);
+ failed_tests++;
+ }
bitmap_clear(bmap1, start, nbits);
__bitmap_clear(bmap2, start, nbits);
- if (!bitmap_equal(bmap1, bmap2, 1024))
+ if (!bitmap_equal(bmap1, bmap2, 1024)) {
printk("clear not equal %d %d\n", start, nbits);
- if (!__bitmap_equal(bmap1, bmap2, 1024))
+ failed_tests++;
+ }
+ if (!__bitmap_equal(bmap1, bmap2, 1024)) {
printk("clear not __equal %d %d\n", start,
nbits);
+ failed_tests++;
+ }
}
}
}
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] bitmap: Fix optimization of bitmap_set/clear for big-endian machines
2017-10-25 12:11 [PATCH] bitmap: Fix optimization of bitmap_set/clear for big-endian machines Matthew Wilcox
@ 2017-11-03 2:57 ` Michael Ellerman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michael Ellerman @ 2017-11-03 2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Matthew Wilcox, Paul Mackerras, Matthew Wilcox, Linus Torvalds,
linux-kernel, linux-s390
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> writes:
> (I don't think I can reliably send patches from outlook; sorry for
> breaking the threading)
>
> I see where we're not incrementing the failure count ... try this patch!
>
> --- 8< ---
>
> Subject: Fix bitmap optimisation tests to report errors correctly
> From: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
>
> I had neglected to increment the error counter when the tests failed,
> which made the tests noisy when they fail, but not actually return an
> error code.
>
> Reported-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
> Cc: stable@kernel.org
Thanks, that works for me.
test_bitmap: failed 31840 out of 460506 tests
cheers
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-11-03 2:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-10-25 12:11 [PATCH] bitmap: Fix optimization of bitmap_set/clear for big-endian machines Matthew Wilcox
2017-11-03 2:57 ` Michael Ellerman
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox