public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com,
	cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 02/10] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 11:13:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9fb32067-4175-cbe3-94d9-e877d5dce703@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b38a0e5-76cf-c3da-fe8d-7a75bf44f19f@linux.ibm.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3077 bytes --]

On 4/22/20 11:06 AM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2020-04-22 09:35, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> On 2/20/20 1:00 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
>>> This patch defines the PSW bits EA/BA used to initialize the PSW masks
>>> for exceptions.
>>>
>>> Since some PSW mask definitions exist already in arch_def.h we add these
>>> definitions there.
>>> We move all PSW definitions together and protect assembler code against
>>> C syntax.
>>
>> Please fix the issue mentioned below and run *all* tests against your
>> new code to verify you didn't introduce regressions.
>>
>> The rest looks good to me.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
>>> ---
>>>   lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 15 +++++++++++----
>>>   s390x/cstart64.S         | 15 ++++++++-------
>>>   2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
>>> index 15a4d49..69a8256 100644
>>> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
>>> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
>>> @@ -10,15 +10,21 @@
>>>   #ifndef _ASM_S390X_ARCH_DEF_H_
>>>   #define _ASM_S390X_ARCH_DEF_H_
>>>   
>>> +#define PSW_MASK_EXT			0x0100000000000000UL
>>> +#define PSW_MASK_DAT			0x0400000000000000UL
>>> +#define PSW_MASK_PSTATE			0x0001000000000000UL
>>> +#define PSW_MASK_BA			0x0000000080000000UL
>>> +#define PSW_MASK_EA			0x0000000100000000UL
>>> +
>>> +#define PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK (PSW_MASK_EA|PSW_MASK_BA)
>>
>> Could you add a space before and after the | ?
>>
>>> +
>>> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLER__
>>> +
>>>   struct psw {
>>>   	uint64_t	mask;
>>>   	uint64_t	addr;
>>>   };
>>>   
>>> -#define PSW_MASK_EXT			0x0100000000000000UL
>>> -#define PSW_MASK_DAT			0x0400000000000000UL
>>> -#define PSW_MASK_PSTATE			0x0001000000000000UL
>>> -
>>>   #define CR0_EXTM_SCLP			0X0000000000000200UL
>>>   #define CR0_EXTM_EXTC			0X0000000000002000UL
>>>   #define CR0_EXTM_EMGC			0X0000000000004000UL
>>> @@ -297,4 +303,5 @@ static inline uint32_t get_prefix(void)
>>>   	return current_prefix;
>>>   }
>>>   
>>> +#endif /* not __ASSEMBLER__ */
>>>   #endif
>>> diff --git a/s390x/cstart64.S b/s390x/cstart64.S
>>> index 45da523..2885a36 100644
>>> --- a/s390x/cstart64.S
>>> +++ b/s390x/cstart64.S
>>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>>>    */
>>>   #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
>>>   #include <asm/sigp.h>
>>> +#include <asm/arch_def.h>
>>>   
>>>   .section .init
>>>   
>>> @@ -214,19 +215,19 @@ svc_int:
>>>   
>>>   	.align	8
>>>   reset_psw:
>>> -	.quad	0x0008000180000000
>>> +	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK
>>
>> That won't work, this is a short PSW and you're removing the short
>> indication here. Notice the 0008 at the front.
>>
> 
> Will change and define PSW_MASK_SHORT_PSW and PSW_RESET_MASK like:
> 
> #define PSW_MASK_SHORT_PSW              0x0008000000000000UL
> ...
> 
> #define PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK      (PSW_MASK_EA | PSW_MASK_BA)
> #define PSW_RESET_MASK          (PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK | PSW_MASK_SHORT_PSW)


Looks good to me, but please send out a new version.



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-22  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-20 12:00 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 00/10] s390x: Testing the Channel Subsystem I/O Pierre Morel
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 01/10] s390x: saving regs for interrupts Pierre Morel
2020-04-22  7:47   ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-22  9:09     ` Pierre Morel
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 02/10] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart Pierre Morel
2020-04-21 16:16   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-22  5:53     ` Pierre Morel
2020-04-22  7:35   ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-22  7:44     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-22  8:59       ` Pierre Morel
2020-04-22  9:07         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-22  9:09           ` Pierre Morel
2020-04-22  9:06     ` Pierre Morel
2020-04-22  9:13       ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 03/10] s390x: cr0: adding AFP-register control bit Pierre Morel
2020-04-21 16:15   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-22  5:54     ` Pierre Morel
2020-04-22  7:39   ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-22  9:11     ` Pierre Morel
2020-04-22  7:59   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-22  9:12     ` Pierre Morel
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 04/10] s390x: interrupt registration Pierre Morel
2020-04-24  8:27   ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-24 10:44     ` Pierre Morel
2020-04-24 10:49       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 05/10] s390x: export the clock get_clock_ms() utility Pierre Morel
2020-04-22  8:05   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-22  9:12     ` Pierre Morel
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 06/10] s390x: Library resources for CSS tests Pierre Morel
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 07/10] s390x: css: stsch, enumeration test Pierre Morel
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 08/10] s390x: css: msch, enable test Pierre Morel
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 09/10] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt Pierre Morel
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 10/10] s390x: css: ping pong Pierre Morel
2020-04-21 16:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 00/10] s390x: Testing the Channel Subsystem I/O Pierre Morel
2020-04-21 16:18   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-22  7:43     ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-22  9:17       ` Pierre Morel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9fb32067-4175-cbe3-94d9-e877d5dce703@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox