public inbox for linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
To: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, david@redhat.com, thuth@redhat.com,
	cohuck@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 02/10] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 09:35:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aae40a5a-63a6-e802-53bb-9683d03ad57d@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1582200043-21760-3-git-send-email-pmorel@linux.ibm.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3130 bytes --]

On 2/20/20 1:00 PM, Pierre Morel wrote:
> This patch defines the PSW bits EA/BA used to initialize the PSW masks
> for exceptions.
> 
> Since some PSW mask definitions exist already in arch_def.h we add these
> definitions there.
> We move all PSW definitions together and protect assembler code against
> C syntax.

Please fix the issue mentioned below and run *all* tests against your
new code to verify you didn't introduce regressions.

The rest looks good to me.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h | 15 +++++++++++----
>  s390x/cstart64.S         | 15 ++++++++-------
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> index 15a4d49..69a8256 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/asm/arch_def.h
> @@ -10,15 +10,21 @@
>  #ifndef _ASM_S390X_ARCH_DEF_H_
>  #define _ASM_S390X_ARCH_DEF_H_
>  
> +#define PSW_MASK_EXT			0x0100000000000000UL
> +#define PSW_MASK_DAT			0x0400000000000000UL
> +#define PSW_MASK_PSTATE			0x0001000000000000UL
> +#define PSW_MASK_BA			0x0000000080000000UL
> +#define PSW_MASK_EA			0x0000000100000000UL
> +
> +#define PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK (PSW_MASK_EA|PSW_MASK_BA)

Could you add a space before and after the | ?

> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLER__
> +
>  struct psw {
>  	uint64_t	mask;
>  	uint64_t	addr;
>  };
>  
> -#define PSW_MASK_EXT			0x0100000000000000UL
> -#define PSW_MASK_DAT			0x0400000000000000UL
> -#define PSW_MASK_PSTATE			0x0001000000000000UL
> -
>  #define CR0_EXTM_SCLP			0X0000000000000200UL
>  #define CR0_EXTM_EXTC			0X0000000000002000UL
>  #define CR0_EXTM_EMGC			0X0000000000004000UL
> @@ -297,4 +303,5 @@ static inline uint32_t get_prefix(void)
>  	return current_prefix;
>  }
>  
> +#endif /* not __ASSEMBLER__ */
>  #endif
> diff --git a/s390x/cstart64.S b/s390x/cstart64.S
> index 45da523..2885a36 100644
> --- a/s390x/cstart64.S
> +++ b/s390x/cstart64.S
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>   */
>  #include <asm/asm-offsets.h>
>  #include <asm/sigp.h>
> +#include <asm/arch_def.h>
>  
>  .section .init
>  
> @@ -214,19 +215,19 @@ svc_int:
>  
>  	.align	8
>  reset_psw:
> -	.quad	0x0008000180000000
> +	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK

That won't work, this is a short PSW and you're removing the short
indication here. Notice the 0008 at the front.

>  initial_psw:
> -	.quad	0x0000000180000000, clear_bss_start
> +	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, clear_bss_start
>  pgm_int_psw:
> -	.quad	0x0000000180000000, pgm_int
> +	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, pgm_int
>  ext_int_psw:
> -	.quad	0x0000000180000000, ext_int
> +	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, ext_int
>  mcck_int_psw:
> -	.quad	0x0000000180000000, mcck_int
> +	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, mcck_int
>  io_int_psw:
> -	.quad	0x0000000180000000, io_int
> +	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, io_int
>  svc_int_psw:
> -	.quad	0x0000000180000000, svc_int
> +	.quad	PSW_EXCEPTION_MASK, svc_int
>  initial_cr0:
>  	/* enable AFP-register control, so FP regs (+BFP instr) can be used */
>  	.quad	0x0000000000040000
> 



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-22  7:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-20 12:00 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 00/10] s390x: Testing the Channel Subsystem I/O Pierre Morel
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 01/10] s390x: saving regs for interrupts Pierre Morel
2020-04-22  7:47   ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-22  9:09     ` Pierre Morel
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 02/10] s390x: Use PSW bits definitions in cstart Pierre Morel
2020-04-21 16:16   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-22  5:53     ` Pierre Morel
2020-04-22  7:35   ` Janosch Frank [this message]
2020-04-22  7:44     ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-22  8:59       ` Pierre Morel
2020-04-22  9:07         ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-22  9:09           ` Pierre Morel
2020-04-22  9:06     ` Pierre Morel
2020-04-22  9:13       ` Janosch Frank
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 03/10] s390x: cr0: adding AFP-register control bit Pierre Morel
2020-04-21 16:15   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-22  5:54     ` Pierre Morel
2020-04-22  7:39   ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-22  9:11     ` Pierre Morel
2020-04-22  7:59   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-22  9:12     ` Pierre Morel
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 04/10] s390x: interrupt registration Pierre Morel
2020-04-24  8:27   ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-24 10:44     ` Pierre Morel
2020-04-24 10:49       ` Cornelia Huck
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 05/10] s390x: export the clock get_clock_ms() utility Pierre Morel
2020-04-22  8:05   ` Cornelia Huck
2020-04-22  9:12     ` Pierre Morel
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 06/10] s390x: Library resources for CSS tests Pierre Morel
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 07/10] s390x: css: stsch, enumeration test Pierre Morel
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 08/10] s390x: css: msch, enable test Pierre Morel
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 09/10] s390x: css: ssch/tsch with sense and interrupt Pierre Morel
2020-02-20 12:00 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 10/10] s390x: css: ping pong Pierre Morel
2020-04-21 16:13 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v5 00/10] s390x: Testing the Channel Subsystem I/O Pierre Morel
2020-04-21 16:18   ` David Hildenbrand
2020-04-22  7:43     ` Janosch Frank
2020-04-22  9:17       ` Pierre Morel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aae40a5a-63a6-e802-53bb-9683d03ad57d@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox