From: "Nico Boehr" <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Janosch Frank" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>, <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
<borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>, <nrb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests 1/5] lib: s390x: Add function to get page root
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2026 13:53:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DHTPHNBLDSL0.1T802QN87CWQC@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260415085145.91197-2-frankja@linux.ibm.com>
On Wed Apr 15, 2026 at 10:45 AM CEST, Janosch Frank wrote:
[...]
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/mmu.h b/lib/s390x/mmu.h
> index dadc2e60..6ba19d28 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/mmu.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/mmu.h
> @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
> #ifndef _S390X_MMU_H_
> #define _S390X_MMU_H_
>
> +#include <asm/arch_def.h>
> +
> enum pgt_level {
> pgtable_level_pgd = 1,
> pgtable_level_p4d,
> @@ -95,4 +97,9 @@ static inline void unprotect_page(void *vaddr, unsigned long prot)
>
> void *get_dat_entry(pgd_t *pgtable, void *vaddr, enum pgt_level level);
>
> +static inline pgd_t *get_page_root(void)
Only nit I have: naming is hard... do you think it makes sense to reflect that
we're talking about the primary-space root here?
get_primary_page_root()?
It's not like we're using the other spaces much in kut, but maybe we will in the
future.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-15 11:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-15 8:45 [kvm-unit-tests 0/5] s390x: Cleanup virtualization library Janosch Frank
2026-04-15 8:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests 1/5] lib: s390x: Add function to get page root Janosch Frank
2026-04-15 11:53 ` Nico Boehr [this message]
2026-04-15 12:01 ` Janosch Frank
2026-04-15 8:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests 2/5] lib: s390x: sie: Allocate physical guest memory via memalign Janosch Frank
2026-04-15 8:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests 3/5] lib: s390x: sie: Free guest memory on destroy Janosch Frank
2026-04-15 14:21 ` Nico Boehr
2026-04-15 8:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests 4/5] lib: s390x: snippet: Add function to create a guest of specific length Janosch Frank
2026-04-15 8:45 ` [kvm-unit-tests 5/5] lib: s390x: Remove kvm s390 prefix from sie control block Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DHTPHNBLDSL0.1T802QN87CWQC@linux.ibm.com \
--to=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox