From: Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@linux.ibm.com>,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com,
kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, alibuda@linux.alibaba.com,
sidraya@linux.ibm.com, hidayath@linux.ibm.com
Cc: pasic@linux.ibm.com, horms@kernel.org, tonylu@linux.alibaba.com,
guwen@linux.alibaba.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] net/smc: fix diag dump lifetime races
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 21:02:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <apbMyLc0IhLMKwwA@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4f303f9f-fd20-475a-8004-1a670dfd34df@linux.ibm.com>
On 2026-08-31 20:27:38, Mahanta Jambigi wrote:
>
>
>On 31/08/26 7:12 pm, Dust Li wrote:
>> On 2026-08-28 08:54:37, Mahanta Jambigi wrote:
>>> This series fixes multiple lifetime races in the SMC diag dump path.
>>>
>>> The first patch adds the basic infrastructure needed to synchronize diag readers
>>> against connection-owned conn->lgr/conn->lnk updates. It introduces a
>>> per-connection spinlock and uses it in the link switch and connection free
>>> handoff paths. conn->lgr and conn->lnk are NULLed under the lock before the
>>> borrowed references are released, so a non-NULL conn->lgr seen under the lock
>>> guarantees the lgr object is alive. The diag reader can rely on this invariant
>>> without borrowing any extra reference.
>>>
>>> The second patch fixes two races in smc_diag itself:
>>>
>>> - serialize clcsock field access against smc_clcsock_release() with
>>> mutex_trylock()
>>> - take conn->lgr_lnk_lock when reading conn->lgr and conn->lnk; use
>>> smc_conn_lgr_valid() inside the lock to check that the connection is
>>> still registered, then snapshot all required fields and call nla_put()
>>> after releasing the lock
>>
>> Hi Mahanta,
>>
>> As discussed in the other thread, I think we should defer the release of
>> smc->clcsock and remove clcsock_release_lock.
>>
>> In that case, we should no longer need these two patches. Also,
>> introducing more locks in SMC is the last thing I want to do :)
>
>Thanks for the new series "[RFC net-next 0/7] net/smc: tie clcsock
>lifetime to the smc socket and remove clcsock_release_lock" — once it
>lands, we can drop the mutex_trylock() fix for Race 1 (clcsock).
>
>However, Race 2 remains open. Your series does not touch smc_core.c or
>smc_cdc.c, so smc_conn_free(), smc_switch_link_and_count(), and
>smc_cdc_msg_validate() still write conn->lgr/conn->lnk with no
>synchronization against the diag reader.
Hi Mahanta,
Thanks for the detailed explanation. You are right that a per-connection
spinlock can work here, and I agree none of the lock sites are on the
per-message hot path. But I think we can also do the same thing we did with
clcsock_release_lock: instead of adding a lock, tie the lifetime of
conn->lgr/conn->lnk to the point where the connection stops being observable,
and remove the need for synchronization altogether.
For lgr/lnk, that point is the hash table. Once the connection is unhashed, the
diag dump (which iterates under the hash read_lock) can no longer reach it. So
if we make sure the connection-owned references are only dropped after unhash,
the invariant becomes: holding the hash read_lock and seeing a non-NULL
conn->lgr implies it is safe to dereference. The diag path then reduces to
`hold hash read_lock -> read conn->lgr -> if non-NULL, use it -> done` with no
new lock, no extra reference, and no trylock. The invariant is carried by
object lifetime rather than by a lock, which I find easier to keep correct over
time.
Best regards,
Dust
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 6:54 [PATCH net v2 0/2] net/smc: fix diag dump lifetime races Mahanta Jambigi
2026-08-28 6:54 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] net/smc: add connection lifetime infrastructure for diag Mahanta Jambigi
2026-08-29 6:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-28 6:54 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] net/smc: fix races in smc_diag dump path Mahanta Jambigi
2026-08-29 6:55 ` sashiko-bot
2026-08-31 13:42 ` [PATCH net v2 0/2] net/smc: fix diag dump lifetime races Dust Li
2026-08-31 14:08 ` Mahanta Jambigi
2026-08-31 14:57 ` Mahanta Jambigi
2026-09-01 13:02 ` Dust Li [this message]
2026-09-01 15:13 ` Mahanta Jambigi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=apbMyLc0IhLMKwwA@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=hidayath@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sidraya@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox