From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Renzo Davoli" <renzo@cs.unibo.it>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/3] seccomp: let the tracer skip a syscall independently of its number
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 08:40:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-178599@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020065635.490528-2-renzo@cs.unibo.it>
> From: Davide Berardi <berardi.dav@gmail.com>
>
> At a PTRACE_EVENT_SECCOMP stop the tracer can only skip the system call
> by setting its number to -1, which seccomp reads back with
> syscall_get_nr(). This depends on how each architecture lays out the
> syscall number and the return value in the registers:
>
> - on some architectures the syscall number shares a register with the
> return value (e.g. v0 on MIPS), so setting the return value after the
> number would overwrite the skip request, and each of them needs its
> own way to keep it (MIPS keeps a copy of the number in thread_info);
>
> - on s390 syscall_get_nr() returns the low 16 bits of int_code, so -1
> is read back as 65535: seccomp does not skip the call but runs the
> filters again on syscall 65535, which kills the task if the filter
> [ ... ]
> The next patch uses this in PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO.
>
> Suggested-by: Michal Suchánek <msuchanek@suse.de>
> Assisted-by: claude-opus-5-5
> Signed-off-by: Renzo Davoli <renzo@cs.unibo.it>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261020065635.490528-1-renzo@cs.unibo.it?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-20 8:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-20 6:56 [PATCH v8 0/3] PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO: add support for seccomp syscall skipping Renzo Davoli
2026-10-20 6:56 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] seccomp: let the tracer skip a syscall independently of its number Renzo Davoli
2026-10-20 8:40 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-20 6:56 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] ptrace: add PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO syscall skipping support Renzo Davoli
2026-10-20 8:53 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 6:56 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] selftests/ptrace: add a test case for PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO syscall skipping Renzo Davoli
2026-10-20 9:12 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-178599@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=renzo@cs.unibo.it \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox