From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Renzo Davoli" <renzo@cs.unibo.it>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, "Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] ptrace: add PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO syscall skipping support
Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2026 08:53:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-178644@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261020065635.490528-3-renzo@cs.unibo.it>
> Extend PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO to support skipping a system call
> triggered via seccomp.
>
> When a tracer retrieves a ptrace_syscall_info structure with 'op' set to
> PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_SECCOMP, it can now choose to skip the system call.
> To do this, the tracer changes 'op' to PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_EXIT and
> populates the exit union fields (rval and is_error) to define the return
> value and error status for the tracee.
>
> The skip request is passed to seccomp with seccomp_ptrace_skip_syscall()
> rather than by setting the system call number to -1, so that it does not
> depend on how the architecture lays out the syscall number and the
> return value in the registers. The tracee then skips the system call
> the same way as for SECCOMP_RET_ERRNO.
>
> Once the system call has been skipped, a further PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO
> with op == PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_SECCOMP during the same stop fails with
> -EINVAL, as the return value may already have overwritten registers
> holding the syscall number or arguments; op ==
> PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_EXIT can still be used to change the return value.
>
> System call suppression via PTRACE_SYSCALL_INFO_ENTRY is currently not
> implemented. On some architectures (e.g. MIPS), when a system call is
> skipped by setting the syscall number to -1 at the entry stop, the
> architecture entry path unconditionally overwrites the return value
> register with -ENOSYS, clobbering any custom return value set by the
> tracer at the entry stop.
>
> Signed-off-by: Renzo Davoli <renzo@cs.unibo.it>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261020065635.490528-1-renzo@cs.unibo.it?part=2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-20 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-20 6:56 [PATCH v8 0/3] PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO: add support for seccomp syscall skipping Renzo Davoli
2026-10-20 6:56 ` [PATCH v8 1/3] seccomp: let the tracer skip a syscall independently of its number Renzo Davoli
2026-10-20 8:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-20 6:56 ` [PATCH v8 2/3] ptrace: add PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO syscall skipping support Renzo Davoli
2026-10-20 8:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-20 6:56 ` [PATCH v8 3/3] selftests/ptrace: add a test case for PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL_INFO syscall skipping Renzo Davoli
2026-10-20 9:12 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-178644@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=renzo@cs.unibo.it \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox