From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@suse.com>,
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@amd.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>,
Michael Kelley <mhklinux@outlook.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 16/22] dma-direct: make dma_direct_map_phys() honor DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 00:39:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq5atsq6hdaa.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710161945.GO118978@ziepe.ca>
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> writes:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 10:52:49AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> >> > /*
>> >> > * For host memory encryption and device requiring unencrypted DMA,
>> >> > * MMIO memory is treated as shared by default.
>> >> > */
>> >> > if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_MMIO) {
>> >> > if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT) || force_dma_unencrypted(dev))
>> >> > attrs |= DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED;
>> >> > }
>> >>
>> >> Yes, I think it does the trick, preserves the current semantics for AMD.
>> >> I guess you could use a single 'if' for all checks (up to you).
>> >
>> > Please don't change it, MMIO P2P is broken on CC systems today and it
>> > should stay broken. Passing DMA_ATTR_MMIO with DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED is
>> > an error that we need to correct in the drivers not make work in the
>> > core code.
>> >
>>
>> But the above changes are intended to handle HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT. In v7, we
>> had the following diff:
>
> To follow how the rest of the decrypted/encrypted stuff works the MMIO
> has to be flaged with CC_SHARED for HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT too, just like
> the PTEs.
>
>> @@ -88,37 +88,40 @@ static inline dma_addr_t dma_direct_map_phys(struct device *dev,
>> {
>> dma_addr_t dma_addr;
>>
>> + /*
>> + * For a device requiring unencrypted DMA, MMIO memory is treated
>> + * as shared by default.
>> + */
>> + if (force_dma_unencrypted(dev) && (attrs & DMA_ATTR_MMIO))
>> + attrs |= DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED;
>
> force_dma_unencrypted() says nothing about the properties of the
> address passed in, this was nonsense :\
>
>> As we discussed [1], that can come in a later patch. In the meantime, adding
>> the HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT check preserves the previous behavior for SME.
>
> It never worked. When we added ATTR_MMIO it started to have a chance
> to work but prior to that it was always broken anyhow. I don't see
> there is much merit in preserving the narrow window when we
> inadvertantly had a half working ATTR_MMIO.
>
> But if you really want to it should be
> cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT) *only* and get rid of the wrong
> force_dma_unencrypted().
>
Ok, I will update the changes to so we preserve the previous behaviour
for SME?
if (attrs & DMA_ATTR_MMIO) {
/*
* For host memory encryption treat MMIO memory as shared
*/
if (cc_platform_has(CC_ATTR_HOST_MEM_ENCRYPT))
attrs |= DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED;
}
Do let me know if you feel strongly that the above change should not be
included and that the SME P2P case should instead be handled in a future
patch.
>
> But IMHO, I'd rather this series treat ATTR_MMIO as private MMIO and
> ATTR_MMIO|CC_SHARED as shared MMIO and that's the right and correct
> thing for the DMA API.
>
If you think the rest of the series is ready for upstream, could you
please ack it so it can be picked up for the next merge window? I'll
repost v8, rebased on top of the pKVM topic branch.
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-01 5:49 [PATCH v7 00/22] dma-mapping: Track shared DMA state through direct, pool and swiotlb paths Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 01/22] dma-direct: return struct page from dma_direct_alloc_from_pool() Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 02/22] dma-pool: fix page leak in atomic_pool_expand() cleanup Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 6:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 03/22] iommu/dma: Check atomic pool allocation result directly Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 04/22] dma: free atomic pool pages by physical address Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 05/22] swiotlb: Preserve allocation virtual address for dynamic pools Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 06/22] s390: Expose protected virtualization through cc_platform_has() Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 07/22] dma-direct: swiotlb: handle swiotlb alloc/free outside __dma_direct_alloc_pages Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 08/22] coco: arm64: s390: powerpc: Mark secure guests with CC_ATTR_GUEST_MEM_ENCRYPT Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-07 15:41 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-07-07 16:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 09/22] dma-mapping: Add internal shared allocation attribute Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 10/22] dma-direct: use __DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_CC_SHARED in alloc/free paths Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 11/22] dma-pool: track decrypted atomic pools and select them via attrs Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 12/22] dma: swiotlb: pass mapping attributes by reference Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 13/22] dma: swiotlb: track pool encryption state and honor DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 14/22] dma-mapping: make dma_pgprot() honor __DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_CC_SHARED Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 15/22] dma-direct: pass attrs to dma_capable() for DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED checks Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 6:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 16/22] dma-direct: make dma_direct_map_phys() honor DMA_ATTR_CC_SHARED Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 6:14 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-08 11:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-07-08 15:09 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-07-08 17:58 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-07-09 11:13 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-07-09 18:13 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-10 5:22 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-07-10 16:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-07-10 19:09 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2026-07-08 12:11 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 17/22] dma-direct: set decrypted flag for remapped DMA allocations Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 18/22] dma-direct: select DMA address encoding from __DMA_ATTR_ALLOC_CC_SHARED Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 19/22] dma-direct: rename ret to cpu_addr in alloc helpers Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 20/22] dma: swiotlb: free dynamic pools from process context Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 21/22] dma: swiotlb: handle set_memory_decrypted() failures Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-01 5:49 ` [PATCH v7 22/22] swiotlb: remove unused SWIOTLB_FORCE flag Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-07-07 8:06 ` [PATCH v7 00/22] dma-mapping: Track shared DMA state through direct, pool and swiotlb paths Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-07-07 13:03 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-07-10 10:50 ` Will Deacon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq5atsq6hdaa.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=gerald.schaefer@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jiri@nvidia.com \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mhklinux@outlook.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ptesarik@suse.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox