Re: [PATCH v2 12/23] drm/exynos: don't track enabled state at exynos_crtc

[Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>]

On 07/10/2015 07:56 AM, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> 2015-07-09 Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>:
> 
>> +Cc Andrzej,
>>
>> On 07/07/2015 02:41 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 06, 2015 at 11:20:13AM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
>>>> From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
>>>>
>>>> struct drm_crtc already stores the enabled state of the crtc
>>>> thus we don't need to replicate enabled in exynos_drm_crtc.
>>>>
>>
>> I think exynos_crtc->enabled can replace flags for power state of each
>> hw driver(e.g. "powered" of mixer driver, "suspended" of fimd driver).
>> Further, we can add other flag bit for instead of using special flag
>> in hw driver like vsync state("int_en" of mixer driver, "irq_flags" of
>> fimd driver.)
> 
> The reason I removed it is because crtc->state->active already stores
> the same information as exynos_crtc->enabled. I think we could rely
> on active as well for mixer powered and suspended.
> 

Then it may need another stuff on struct exynos_crtc if we try to
replace other hw flag like int_en or irq_flags.

Anyway, the reason that you remove it is ok to me now.

Thanks.