From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, pjones@redhat.com,
michaelc@cs.wisc.edu, James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] scsi_dh: Add modalias support for SCSI targets
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:54:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1237488880.26341.15.camel@chandra-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1237403902.14147.25.camel@chandra-ubuntu>
On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 12:18 -0700, Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-03-18 at 19:30 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 02:36, Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > > From: Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>
> > >
> > > This patch allows the use of modaliases on scsi targets to correctly
> > > load scsi device handler modules when the devices are found.
> > > +++ linux-2.6.28/include/linux/mod_devicetable.h
> > > @@ -454,4 +454,10 @@ struct dmi_system_id {
> > >
> > > #define DMI_MATCH(a, b) { a, b }
> > >
> > > +struct scsi_dh_device_id {
> > > + unsigned char type;
> > > + char vendor[9];
> > > + char model[17];
> > > +};
> >
> > Doesn't the static array waste space, when used for the long lists of
> > entries stuffed in arrays of this structure? It will carry a lot of \0
> > chars, and identical strings can not be de-duplicated by the compiler,
> > unlike when pointers are used?
> >
>
> I had some problems when we used the pointers instead of arrays. Don't
> recall it now.
>
> Will retry and report.
Hi Kay,
I tried it and realized modpost is what is giving the problem.
When the array for vendor and model is changed to pointers, modpost (at
the end of make modules) dies with a segmentation fault.
Peter, Any details that you can provide ?
> > Thanks,
> > Kay
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-19 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-18 1:36 [PATCH 0/3] scsi_dh: Make scsi device handler modules automatically inserted Chandra Seetharaman
2009-03-18 1:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] scsi_dh: Add modalias support for SCSI targets Chandra Seetharaman
2009-03-18 13:44 ` Konrad Rzeszutek
2009-03-18 14:02 ` James Bottomley
2009-03-18 14:36 ` Konrad Rzeszutek
2009-03-18 18:30 ` Kay Sievers
2009-03-18 19:18 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-03-19 18:54 ` Chandra Seetharaman [this message]
2009-03-20 18:24 ` Peter Jones
2009-03-23 22:13 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-03 22:43 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-07 20:59 ` James Bottomley
2009-04-07 23:41 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-08 15:08 ` Peter Jones
2009-04-15 21:52 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-16 15:18 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-04-07 23:22 ` Hannes Reinecke
2009-04-07 23:50 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-08 5:15 ` Kay Sievers
2009-04-08 19:13 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-03-18 18:47 ` James Bottomley
2009-03-18 19:12 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-03-18 20:09 ` James Bottomley
2009-03-18 20:24 ` Kay Sievers
2009-03-18 20:26 ` James Bottomley
2009-03-18 20:59 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-03-20 17:41 ` Peter Jones
2009-03-18 1:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi_dh: Change scsi device handler modules to utilize modalias Chandra Seetharaman
2009-03-18 13:46 ` Konrad Rzeszutek
2009-03-18 15:43 ` Stefan Richter
2009-03-18 17:25 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-03-18 17:50 ` Stefan Richter
2009-03-18 18:18 ` Kay Sievers
2009-03-18 19:44 ` Stefan Richter
2009-03-18 18:50 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2009-03-18 19:46 ` Stefan Richter
2009-03-18 1:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi_dh: Workaround a race condition in module insertion Chandra Seetharaman
2009-03-18 11:31 ` [PATCH 0/3] scsi_dh: Make scsi device handler modules automatically inserted Hannes Reinecke
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-04-27 18:06 Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-27 18:06 ` [PATCH 1/3] scsi_dh: Add modalias support for SCSI targets Chandra Seetharaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1237488880.26341.15.camel@chandra-ubuntu \
--to=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
--cc=sekharan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox