Re: [PATCH v6 11/11] scsi: ufs: core: Move code out of an if-statement

[Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>]

On 10/31/24 2:15 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 10/31/24 12:55 PM, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Le 31/10/2024 à 18:51, Bart Van Assche a écrit :
>>> Is the patch below sufficient to fix both issues?
>>
>> Yes it does!
> 
> Thank you for having tested this patch quickly. Would it be possible
> to test whether the patch below also fixes the reported boot failure?
> I think the patch below is a better fix.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.
> 
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> index a5a0646bb80a..3b592492e152 100644
> --- a/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/ufs/host/ufs-qcom.c
> @@ -874,7 +874,8 @@ static void ufs_qcom_advertise_quirks(struct ufs_hba 
> *hba)
>       if (host->hw_ver.major > 0x3)
>           hba->quirks |= UFSHCD_QUIRK_REINIT_AFTER_MAX_GEAR_SWITCH;
> 
> -    if (of_device_is_compatible(hba->dev->of_node, "qcom,sm8550-ufshc"))
> +    if (of_device_is_compatible(hba->dev->of_node, "qcom,sm8550-ufshc") ||
> +        of_device_is_compatible(hba->dev->of_node, "qcom,sm8650-ufshc"))
>           hba->quirks |= UFSHCD_QUIRK_BROKEN_LSDBS_CAP;
>   }

(replying to my own email)

Can anyone who has access to a Qualcomm SM8650 Platform please help with
testing the above patch on top of linux-next?

Thanks,

Bart.