public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/24] libfc: fixed a soft lockup issue in fc_exch_recv_abts
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:54:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090227185451.25509.31158.stgit@fritz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090227185430.25509.34309.stgit@fritz>

From: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com>

The fc_seq_start_next grabs ep->ex_lock but this lock was already held here,
so instead called fc_seq_start_next_locked to avoid soft lockup.

Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
---

 drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
index e874e77..dd269e5 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_exch.c
@@ -1096,7 +1096,7 @@ static void fc_exch_recv_abts(struct fc_exch *ep, struct fc_frame *rx_fp)
 		ap->ba_high_seq_cnt = fh->fh_seq_cnt;
 		ap->ba_low_seq_cnt = htons(sp->cnt);
 	}
-	sp = fc_seq_start_next(sp);
+	sp = fc_seq_start_next_locked(sp);
 	spin_unlock_bh(&ep->ex_lock);
 	fc_seq_send_last(sp, fp, FC_RCTL_BA_ACC, FC_TYPE_BLS);
 	fc_frame_free(rx_fp);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2009-02-27 18:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-27 18:54 [PATCH 00/24] libfc and fcoe fixes for 2.6.29-rc Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:54 ` [PATCH 01/24] libfc: Pass lport in exch_mgr_reset Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:54 ` [PATCH 02/24] libfc: when rport goes away (re-plogi), clean up exchanges to/from rport Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:54 ` [PATCH 03/24] libfc: handle RRQ exch timeout Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:54 ` Robert Love [this message]
2009-02-27 18:54 ` [PATCH 05/24] libfc, fcoe: fixed locking issues with lport->lp_mutex around lport->link_status Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 06/24] libfc: rport retry on LS_RJT from certain ELS Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 07/24] libfc: fixed a read IO data integrity issue when a IO data frame lost Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 08/24] libfc: exch mgr is freed while lport still retrying sequences Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 09/24] libfc: Don't violate transport template for rogue port creation Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 10/24] libfc: correct RPORT_TO_PRIV usage Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 11/24] libfc: rename rp to rdata in fc_disc_new_target() Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 12/24] libfc: check for err when recv and state is incorrect Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 13/24] libfc: Cleanup libfc_function_template comments Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 14/24] libfc, fcoe: Fix kerneldoc comments Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 15/24] libfc, fcoe: Cleanup function formatting and minor typos Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 16/24] libfc, fcoe: Remove unnecessary cast by removing inline wrapper Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 17/24] fcoe: Use setup_timer() and mod_timer() Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 18/24] fcoe: Correct fcoe_transports initialization vs. registration Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 19/24] libfc: do not change the fh_rx_id of a recevied frame Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 20/24] fcoe: ETH_P_8021Q is already in if_ether and fcoe is not using it anyway Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 21/24] fcoe: fix kfree(skb) Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 22/24] fcoe: Out of order tx frames was causing several check condition SCSI status Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 23/24] fcoe: fix handling of pending queue, prevent out of order frames (v3) Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 24/24] fcoe: Change fcoe receive thread nice value from 19 (lowest priority) to -20 Robert Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20090227185451.25509.31158.stgit@fritz \
    --to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
    --cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox