From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 07/24] libfc: fixed a read IO data integrity issue when a IO data frame lost
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:55:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090227185507.25509.87242.stgit@fritz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090227185430.25509.34309.stgit@fritz>
From: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com>
The fc_fcp_complete_locked detected data underrun in this case and set
the FC_DATA_UNDRUN but that was ignored by fc_io_compl for all cases
including read underrun.
Added code to not to ignore FC_DATA_UNDRUN for read IO and instead
suggested scsi-ml to retry cmd to recover from lost data frame.
Not sure if it is okay to ignore FC_DATA_UNDRUN for other case, so let
code as is for other cases but removed or-ing with zero valued fsp->cdb_status
for those cases.
Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
---
drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c | 6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c
index f440aac..ecc7261 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/libfc/fc_fcp.c
@@ -1810,12 +1810,12 @@ static void fc_io_compl(struct fc_fcp_pkt *fsp)
sc_cmd->result = DID_ERROR << 16;
break;
case FC_DATA_UNDRUN:
- if (fsp->cdb_status == 0) {
+ if ((fsp->cdb_status == 0) && !(fsp->req_flags & FC_SRB_READ)) {
/*
* scsi status is good but transport level
- * underrun. for read it should be an error??
+ * underrun.
*/
- sc_cmd->result = (DID_OK << 16) | fsp->cdb_status;
+ sc_cmd->result = DID_OK << 16;
} else {
/*
* scsi got underrun, this is an error
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-27 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-27 18:54 [PATCH 00/24] libfc and fcoe fixes for 2.6.29-rc Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:54 ` [PATCH 01/24] libfc: Pass lport in exch_mgr_reset Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:54 ` [PATCH 02/24] libfc: when rport goes away (re-plogi), clean up exchanges to/from rport Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:54 ` [PATCH 03/24] libfc: handle RRQ exch timeout Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:54 ` [PATCH 04/24] libfc: fixed a soft lockup issue in fc_exch_recv_abts Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:54 ` [PATCH 05/24] libfc, fcoe: fixed locking issues with lport->lp_mutex around lport->link_status Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 06/24] libfc: rport retry on LS_RJT from certain ELS Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` Robert Love [this message]
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 08/24] libfc: exch mgr is freed while lport still retrying sequences Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 09/24] libfc: Don't violate transport template for rogue port creation Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 10/24] libfc: correct RPORT_TO_PRIV usage Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 11/24] libfc: rename rp to rdata in fc_disc_new_target() Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 12/24] libfc: check for err when recv and state is incorrect Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 13/24] libfc: Cleanup libfc_function_template comments Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 14/24] libfc, fcoe: Fix kerneldoc comments Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 15/24] libfc, fcoe: Cleanup function formatting and minor typos Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:55 ` [PATCH 16/24] libfc, fcoe: Remove unnecessary cast by removing inline wrapper Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 17/24] fcoe: Use setup_timer() and mod_timer() Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 18/24] fcoe: Correct fcoe_transports initialization vs. registration Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 19/24] libfc: do not change the fh_rx_id of a recevied frame Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 20/24] fcoe: ETH_P_8021Q is already in if_ether and fcoe is not using it anyway Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 21/24] fcoe: fix kfree(skb) Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 22/24] fcoe: Out of order tx frames was causing several check condition SCSI status Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 23/24] fcoe: fix handling of pending queue, prevent out of order frames (v3) Robert Love
2009-02-27 18:56 ` [PATCH 24/24] fcoe: Change fcoe receive thread nice value from 19 (lowest priority) to -20 Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090227185507.25509.87242.stgit@fritz \
--to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox