From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, babu.moger@lsi.com, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu,
Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] scsi_dh: Make scsi_dh_activate asynchronous
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:52:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090428025230.11108.88559.sendpatchset@chandra-ubuntu> (raw)
Hello All,
Currently, device handlers process path activation in series. This leads
to a lot of time delay when more than 100 luns are involved. For example,
with lsi rdac 100+ luns take about 12-15 minutes. This was found by Moger
Babu of LSI.
This time delay can be avoided if we can do the activations asynchronously.
By making scsi_dh_activate() async, we can give the device handlers an
oppurtunity to decide on how to send the device activation down the wire
to make the turn around time faster. They can send the commands
asynchronously or send them in batches.
I brought up this issue on th emailing list few days back
(http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=123888063818755&w=2).
This set of patches applies cleanly on 2.6.30-rc3 and is tested on the same.
Please review and provide comments.
This set of patched adds asynchronous support only to rdac handler. WIll be
sending patches to support other handlers too.
Thanks & Regards,
chandra
next reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-28 2:52 Chandra Seetharaman [this message]
2009-04-28 2:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] scsi_dh: Change the scsidh_activate interface to be asynchronous Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-29 21:11 ` Moger, Babu
2009-04-28 2:52 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi_dh: Remove the workqueue used for activate Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-29 21:12 ` Moger, Babu
2009-05-07 3:32 ` Mike Christie
2009-05-08 0:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi_dh: Remove the workqueue used foractivate Chandra Seetharaman
2009-05-08 3:09 ` Mike Christie
2009-05-08 5:25 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/3] scsi_dh: Remove the workqueue usedforactivate Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-28 2:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi_dh: rdac handler: Batch up MODE SELECTs and send few of them Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-29 21:12 ` Moger, Babu
2009-05-07 3:39 ` Mike Christie
2009-05-08 0:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi_dh: rdac handler: Batch up MODE SELECTsand " Chandra Seetharaman
2009-09-12 4:09 ` [dm-devel] " Shyam_Iyer
2009-09-14 19:25 ` Chandra Seetharaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090428025230.11108.88559.sendpatchset@chandra-ubuntu \
--to=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@lsi.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox