From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, babu.moger@lsi.com, michaelc@cs.wisc.edu,
Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] scsi_dh: Remove the workqueue used for activate
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:52:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090428025242.11108.43024.sendpatchset@chandra-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090428025230.11108.88559.sendpatchset@chandra-ubuntu>
Since scsi_dh_activate() has become an asynchronous function,
we do not need a workqueue for submitting scsi_dh_activate().
This patch just removes the workqueue that submits scsi_dh_activate().
---------
Signed-off-by: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
---
drivers/md/dm-mpath.c | 51 ++++----------------------------------------------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.29/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.29.orig/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
+++ linux-2.6.29/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
@@ -64,8 +64,6 @@ struct multipath {
spinlock_t lock;
const char *hw_handler_name;
- struct work_struct activate_path;
- struct pgpath *pgpath_to_activate;
unsigned nr_priority_groups;
struct list_head priority_groups;
unsigned pg_init_required; /* pg_init needs calling? */
@@ -110,11 +108,11 @@ typedef int (*action_fn) (struct pgpath
static struct kmem_cache *_mpio_cache;
-static struct workqueue_struct *kmultipathd, *kmpath_handlerd;
+static struct workqueue_struct *kmultipathd;
static void process_queued_ios(struct work_struct *work);
static void trigger_event(struct work_struct *work);
-static void activate_path(struct work_struct *work);
static void deactivate_path(struct work_struct *work);
+static void pg_init_done(void *path, int errors);
/*-----------------------------------------------
@@ -160,7 +158,6 @@ static struct priority_group *alloc_prio
static void free_pgpaths(struct list_head *pgpaths, struct dm_target *ti)
{
- unsigned long flags;
struct pgpath *pgpath, *tmp;
struct multipath *m = ti->private;
@@ -169,10 +166,6 @@ static void free_pgpaths(struct list_hea
if (m->hw_handler_name)
scsi_dh_detach(bdev_get_queue(pgpath->path.dev->bdev));
dm_put_device(ti, pgpath->path.dev);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&m->lock, flags);
- if (m->pgpath_to_activate == pgpath)
- m->pgpath_to_activate = NULL;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->lock, flags);
free_pgpath(pgpath);
}
}
@@ -202,7 +195,6 @@ static struct multipath *alloc_multipath
m->queue_io = 1;
INIT_WORK(&m->process_queued_ios, process_queued_ios);
INIT_WORK(&m->trigger_event, trigger_event);
- INIT_WORK(&m->activate_path, activate_path);
m->mpio_pool = mempool_create_slab_pool(MIN_IOS, _mpio_cache);
if (!m->mpio_pool) {
kfree(m);
@@ -446,7 +438,6 @@ static void process_queued_ios(struct wo
must_queue = 0;
if (m->pg_init_required && !m->pg_init_in_progress && pgpath) {
- m->pgpath_to_activate = pgpath;
m->pg_init_count++;
m->pg_init_required = 0;
m->pg_init_in_progress = 1;
@@ -457,7 +448,8 @@ out:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->lock, flags);
if (init_required)
- queue_work(kmpath_handlerd, &m->activate_path);
+ scsi_dh_activate(bdev_get_queue(pgpath->path.dev->bdev),
+ pg_init_done, &pgpath->path);
if (!must_queue)
dispatch_queued_ios(m);
@@ -834,7 +826,6 @@ static void multipath_dtr(struct dm_targ
{
struct multipath *m = (struct multipath *) ti->private;
- flush_workqueue(kmpath_handlerd);
flush_workqueue(kmultipathd);
free_multipath(m);
}
@@ -1116,24 +1107,6 @@ static void pg_init_done(void *data, int
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->lock, flags);
}
-static void activate_path(struct work_struct *work)
-{
- int ret;
- struct multipath *m =
- container_of(work, struct multipath, activate_path);
- struct dm_path *path;
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&m->lock, flags);
- path = &m->pgpath_to_activate->path;
- m->pgpath_to_activate = NULL;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->lock, flags);
- if (!path)
- return;
- ret = scsi_dh_activate(bdev_get_queue(path->dev->bdev),
- pg_init_done, path);
-}
-
/*
* end_io handling
*/
@@ -1471,21 +1444,6 @@ static int __init dm_multipath_init(void
return -ENOMEM;
}
- /*
- * A separate workqueue is used to handle the device handlers
- * to avoid overloading existing workqueue. Overloading the
- * old workqueue would also create a bottleneck in the
- * path of the storage hardware device activation.
- */
- kmpath_handlerd = create_singlethread_workqueue("kmpath_handlerd");
- if (!kmpath_handlerd) {
- DMERR("failed to create workqueue kmpath_handlerd");
- destroy_workqueue(kmultipathd);
- dm_unregister_target(&multipath_target);
- kmem_cache_destroy(_mpio_cache);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
-
DMINFO("version %u.%u.%u loaded",
multipath_target.version[0], multipath_target.version[1],
multipath_target.version[2]);
@@ -1495,7 +1453,6 @@ static int __init dm_multipath_init(void
static void __exit dm_multipath_exit(void)
{
- destroy_workqueue(kmpath_handlerd);
destroy_workqueue(kmultipathd);
dm_unregister_target(&multipath_target);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-28 2:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-28 2:52 [PATCH 0/3] scsi_dh: Make scsi_dh_activate asynchronous Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-28 2:52 ` [PATCH 1/3] scsi_dh: Change the scsidh_activate interface to be asynchronous Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-29 21:11 ` Moger, Babu
2009-04-28 2:52 ` Chandra Seetharaman [this message]
2009-04-29 21:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi_dh: Remove the workqueue used for activate Moger, Babu
2009-05-07 3:32 ` Mike Christie
2009-05-08 0:35 ` [PATCH 2/3] scsi_dh: Remove the workqueue used foractivate Chandra Seetharaman
2009-05-08 3:09 ` Mike Christie
2009-05-08 5:25 ` [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/3] scsi_dh: Remove the workqueue usedforactivate Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-28 2:52 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi_dh: rdac handler: Batch up MODE SELECTs and send few of them Chandra Seetharaman
2009-04-29 21:12 ` Moger, Babu
2009-05-07 3:39 ` Mike Christie
2009-05-08 0:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] scsi_dh: rdac handler: Batch up MODE SELECTsand " Chandra Seetharaman
2009-09-12 4:09 ` [dm-devel] " Shyam_Iyer
2009-09-14 19:25 ` Chandra Seetharaman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090428025242.11108.43024.sendpatchset@chandra-ubuntu \
--to=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=babu.moger@lsi.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox