From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: "Peter Wang (王信友)" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
"mani@kernel.org" <mani@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"nitin.rawat@oss.qualcomm.com" <nitin.rawat@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ufs: Remove the clock gating code
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 14:27:48 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25f3e3af-5a38-4e86-97c4-80c8fa2a1f90@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2798fa37f745f9d91757f5097e158c61f72bc835.camel@mediatek.com>
On 1/25/26 7:44 PM, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:
> This is true when it comes to power saving, but not when it comes to
> performance. UFS resume takes more time than simply turning the
> clock on.
Hi Peter,
It seems to me that there is insufficient consensus to proceed with the
current form of this patch series. I will look into moving the clock
gating code into the runtime suspend and resume callbacks without
affecting the behavior of the UFS driver.
Thanks,
Bart.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-26 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-16 18:26 [PATCH 0/7] ufs: Remove the clock gating code Bart Van Assche
2026-01-16 18:26 ` [PATCH 1/7] ufs: core: Change the type of an ufshcd_clkgate_delay_set() argument Bart Van Assche
2026-01-16 18:26 ` [PATCH 2/7] ufs: host: mediatek: Use ufshcd_clkgate_delay_set() Bart Van Assche
2026-01-16 18:26 ` [PATCH 3/7] ufs: core: Redirect clock gating to RPM Bart Van Assche
2026-01-17 2:05 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-17 2:16 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-16 18:26 ` [PATCH 4/7] ufs: core: Switch from " Bart Van Assche
2026-01-16 18:26 ` [PATCH 5/7] ufs: core: Remove unused code and data structures Bart Van Assche
2026-01-17 2:16 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-16 18:26 ` [PATCH 6/7] ufs: core: Remove superfluous ufshcd_{hold,release}() calls Bart Van Assche
2026-01-16 18:26 ` [PATCH 7/7] ufs: core: Remove ufshcd_{hold,release}() calls from the I/O path Bart Van Assche
2026-01-22 17:30 ` [PATCH 0/7] ufs: Remove the clock gating code Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-01-23 7:26 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2026-01-23 23:27 ` Bart Van Assche
2026-01-26 3:44 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2026-01-26 22:27 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25f3e3af-5a38-4e86-97c4-80c8fa2a1f90@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=nitin.rawat@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox