Re: [PATCH V1 2/4] scsi: ufs: qcom: dt-bindings: Add UFSHC compatible for Hamoa

[Pradeep Pragallapati <pradeep.pragallapati@oss.qualcomm.com>]

On 12/29/2025 5:50 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/12/2025 08:13, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 29/12/2025 07:06, Pradeep P V K wrote:
>>> Document the UFSHC compatible for Qualcomm Hamoa SoC. Use fallback
>>> to indicate the compatibility of UFSHC on Hamoa with that on the
>>> SM8550.
>> Same problem.
i will update in my next patchset.
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Pradeep P V K <pradeep.pragallapati@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>> ---
>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml          | 6 +++++-
>>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml
>>> index d94ef4e6b85a..3b5a95db7831 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ufs/qcom,sc7180-ufshc.yaml
>> That's older devices binding. Why would Hamoa fit here?
Hamoa is leverage from SM8550 which is a non-mcq target. Hence it would 
fit here.
>
> ... and why even bothering with testing this? Every internal guide tells
> you this yet you sent it untested.
sorry for the inconvenience, actually i made the proper changes but 
missed to amend while posting the changes.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof