public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>,
	alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com,
	asutoshd@codeaurora.org, jejb@linux.ibm.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, stanley.chu@mediatek.com,
	beanhuo@micron.com, tomas.winkler@intel.com, cang@codeaurora.org
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] scsi: ufs: Delete struct ufs_dev_desc
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:53:18 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <afc473b1-6857-4cca-101d-2382f5314f0d@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200116215914.16015-3-huobean@gmail.com>

On 2020-01-16 13:59, Bean Huo wrote:
>  struct ufs_dev_fix {
> -	struct ufs_dev_desc card;
> +	u16 wmanufacturerid;
> +	u8 *model;
>  	unsigned int quirk;
>  };
>  
> -#define END_FIX { { 0 }, 0 }
> +#define END_FIX { 0 }

A minor comment: please use { } instead of { 0 }.

>  /* add specific device quirk */
>  #define UFS_FIX(_vendor, _model, _quirk) { \
> -	.card.wmanufacturerid = (_vendor),\
> -	.card.model = (_model),		   \
> +	.wmanufacturerid = (_vendor),\
> +	.model = (_model),		   \
>  	.quirk = (_quirk),		   \
>  }

Is this macro useful? Does it improve readability of the code? If not,
how about removing it (maybe later)?

Anyway:

Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-17  3:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-16 21:59 [PATCH v2 0/9] Use UFS device indicated maximum LU number Bean Huo
2020-01-16 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] scsi: ufs: goto with returned value while failed to add WL Bean Huo
2020-01-17  3:56   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-01-17 12:57     ` [EXT] " Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2020-01-17 18:23   ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2020-01-16 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] scsi: ufs: Delete struct ufs_dev_desc Bean Huo
2020-01-17  3:53   ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2020-01-17 12:55     ` [EXT] " Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2020-01-17 18:21   ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2020-01-16 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] scsi: ufs: Split ufshcd_probe_hba() based on its called flow Bean Huo
2020-01-17 20:13   ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2020-01-16 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] scsi: ufs: Move ufshcd_get_max_pwr_mode() to ufs_init_params() Bean Huo
2020-01-16 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] scsi: ufs: Delete two unnecessary functions Bean Huo
2020-01-17  3:58   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-01-17 13:32     ` [EXT] " Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2020-01-16 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] scsi: ufs: Delete is_init_prefetch from struct ufs_hba Bean Huo
2020-01-17  4:00   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-01-17 13:12     ` [EXT] " Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2020-01-16 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] scsi: ufs: Add max_lu_supported in struct ufs_dev_info Bean Huo
2020-01-17  4:02   ` Bart Van Assche
2020-01-17 13:17     ` [EXT] " Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2020-01-16 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] scsi: ufs: Initialize max_lu_supported Bean Huo
2020-01-16 21:59 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] scsi: ufs: Use UFS device indicated maximum LU number Bean Huo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=afc473b1-6857-4cca-101d-2382f5314f0d@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=huobean@gmail.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox