From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: cgzones@googlemail.com
Cc: LSM <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
chengzhihao1 <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
DRI mailing list <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
cocci <cocci@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] ubifs: reorder capability check last
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:30:58 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1045101183.70157813.1732534258584.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241125104011.36552-5-cgoettsche@seltendoof.de>
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Christian Göttsche" <cgoettsche@seltendoof.de>
> capable() calls refer to enabled LSMs whether to permit or deny the
> request. This is relevant in connection with SELinux, where a
> capability check results in a policy decision and by default a denial
> message on insufficient permission is issued.
> It can lead to three undesired cases:
> 1. A denial message is generated, even in case the operation was an
> unprivileged one and thus the syscall succeeded, creating noise.
> 2. To avoid the noise from 1. the policy writer adds a rule to ignore
> those denial messages, hiding future syscalls, where the task
> performs an actual privileged operation, leading to hidden limited
> functionality of that task.
> 3. To avoid the noise from 1. the policy writer adds a rule to permit
> the task the requested capability, while it does not need it,
> violating the principle of least privilege.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_drv.c | 2 +-
This change is unrelated, please remove it.
> fs/ubifs/budget.c | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
[...]
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/budget.c b/fs/ubifs/budget.c
> index d76eb7b39f56..6137aeadec3f 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/budget.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/budget.c
> @@ -256,8 +256,9 @@ long long ubifs_calc_available(const struct ubifs_info *c,
> int min_idx_lebs)
> */
> static int can_use_rp(struct ubifs_info *c)
> {
> - if (uid_eq(current_fsuid(), c->rp_uid) || capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) ||
> - (!gid_eq(c->rp_gid, GLOBAL_ROOT_GID) && in_group_p(c->rp_gid)))
> + if (uid_eq(current_fsuid(), c->rp_uid) ||
> + (!gid_eq(c->rp_gid, GLOBAL_ROOT_GID) && in_group_p(c->rp_gid)) ||
> + capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
> return 1;
> return 0;
> }
The UBIFS part looks ok:
Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Since I was not CC'ed to the whole series, I miss a lot of context.
Will this series merged as a whole? By whom?
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-25 11:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-25 10:39 [PATCH 02/11] quota: reorder capability check last Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:39 ` [PATCH 03/11] ext4: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:39 ` [PATCH 04/11] hugetlbfs: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:39 ` [PATCH 05/11] genwqe: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:39 ` [PATCH 06/11] ubifs: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 11:10 ` Liviu Dudau
2024-11-25 11:30 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2024-11-25 11:48 ` Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:39 ` [PATCH 07/11] ipv4: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-26 8:01 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-11-25 10:40 ` [PATCH 08/11] gfs2: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 11:34 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2024-11-25 10:40 ` [PATCH 09/11] fs: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 12:17 ` Christian Brauner
2024-11-25 10:40 ` [PATCH 10/11] skbuff: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:40 ` [PATCH 11/11] infiniband: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:40 ` [PATCH 01/11] coccinelle: Add script to reorder capable() calls Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 17:48 ` [cocci] " Markus Elfring
2024-11-26 12:55 ` Markus Elfring
2024-11-27 11:45 ` Markus Elfring
2024-11-29 12:38 ` Markus Elfring
2024-11-30 4:08 ` Serge E. Hallyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1045101183.70157813.1732534258584.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
--cc=cgzones@googlemail.com \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=cocci@inria.fr \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox