Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: cgzones@googlemail.com
Cc: LSM <linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>,
	 Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	 Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@arm.com>,
	 Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	 Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	 Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	 David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>,
	Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	 chengzhihao1 <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>,
	 "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	 Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>,
	 Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
	 linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 DRI mailing list <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	 linux-mtd <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
	cocci <cocci@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/11] ubifs: reorder capability check last
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 12:30:58 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1045101183.70157813.1732534258584.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241125104011.36552-5-cgoettsche@seltendoof.de>

----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Christian Göttsche" <cgoettsche@seltendoof.de>
> capable() calls refer to enabled LSMs whether to permit or deny the
> request.  This is relevant in connection with SELinux, where a
> capability check results in a policy decision and by default a denial
> message on insufficient permission is issued.
> It can lead to three undesired cases:
>  1. A denial message is generated, even in case the operation was an
>     unprivileged one and thus the syscall succeeded, creating noise.
>  2. To avoid the noise from 1. the policy writer adds a rule to ignore
>     those denial messages, hiding future syscalls, where the task
>     performs an actual privileged operation, leading to hidden limited
>     functionality of that task.
>  3. To avoid the noise from 1. the policy writer adds a rule to permit
>     the task the requested capability, while it does not need it,
>     violating the principle of least privilege.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/panthor/panthor_drv.c | 2 +-

This change is unrelated, please remove it.

> fs/ubifs/budget.c                     | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

[...]

> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/budget.c b/fs/ubifs/budget.c
> index d76eb7b39f56..6137aeadec3f 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/budget.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/budget.c
> @@ -256,8 +256,9 @@ long long ubifs_calc_available(const struct ubifs_info *c,
> int min_idx_lebs)
>  */
> static int can_use_rp(struct ubifs_info *c)
> {
> -	if (uid_eq(current_fsuid(), c->rp_uid) || capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE) ||
> -	    (!gid_eq(c->rp_gid, GLOBAL_ROOT_GID) && in_group_p(c->rp_gid)))
> +	if (uid_eq(current_fsuid(), c->rp_uid) ||
> +	    (!gid_eq(c->rp_gid, GLOBAL_ROOT_GID) && in_group_p(c->rp_gid)) ||
> +	    capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
> 		return 1;
> 	return 0;
> }

The UBIFS part looks ok:

Acked-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>

Since I was not CC'ed to the whole series, I miss a lot of context.
Will this series merged as a whole? By whom?

Thanks,
//richard

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-11-25 11:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-25 10:39 [PATCH 02/11] quota: reorder capability check last Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:39 ` [PATCH 03/11] ext4: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:39 ` [PATCH 04/11] hugetlbfs: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:39 ` [PATCH 05/11] genwqe: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:39 ` [PATCH 06/11] ubifs: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 11:10   ` Liviu Dudau
2024-11-25 11:30   ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2024-11-25 11:48     ` Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:39 ` [PATCH 07/11] ipv4: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-26  8:01   ` Paolo Abeni
2024-11-25 10:40 ` [PATCH 08/11] gfs2: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 11:34   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2024-11-25 10:40 ` [PATCH 09/11] fs: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 12:17   ` Christian Brauner
2024-11-25 10:40 ` [PATCH 10/11] skbuff: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:40 ` [PATCH 11/11] infiniband: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:40 ` [PATCH 01/11] coccinelle: Add script to reorder capable() calls Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 17:48   ` [cocci] " Markus Elfring
2024-11-26 12:55   ` Markus Elfring
2024-11-27 11:45   ` Markus Elfring
2024-11-29 12:38   ` Markus Elfring
2024-11-30  4:08   ` Serge E. Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1045101183.70157813.1732534258584.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at \
    --to=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=Julia.Lawall@inria.fr \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=cgzones@googlemail.com \
    --cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=cocci@inria.fr \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liviu.dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox