From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
To: cgzones@googlemail.com
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>,
Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@imag.fr>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cocci@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] coccinelle: Add script to reorder capable() calls
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 22:08:42 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241130040842.GB65112@mail.hallyn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241125104011.36552-11-cgoettsche@seltendoof.de>
On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 11:40:04AM +0100, Christian Göttsche wrote:
> From: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
>
> capable() calls refer to enabled LSMs whether to permit or deny the
> request. This is relevant in connection with SELinux, where a
> capability check results in a policy decision and by default a denial
> message on insufficient permission is issued.
> It can lead to three undesired cases:
> 1. A denial message is generated, even in case the operation was an
> unprivileged one and thus the syscall succeeded, creating noise.
> 2. To avoid the noise from 1. the policy writer adds a rule to ignore
> those denial messages, hiding future syscalls, where the task
> performs an actual privileged operation, leading to hidden limited
> functionality of that task.
> 3. To avoid the noise from 1. the policy writer adds a rule to permit
> the task the requested capability, while it does not need it,
> violating the principle of least privilege.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Göttsche <cgzones@googlemail.com>
Hi,
these all look good to me.
Reviewed-by: Serge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>
Except for, in fact, this patch, as I'm not versed in .cocci and
can't tell whether it's doing the right thing. Looks like it is,
based on the patches you sent...
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> scripts/coccinelle/api/capable_order.cocci | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 99 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 scripts/coccinelle/api/capable_order.cocci
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index e7f017097701..ab5ea47b61e2 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -5106,6 +5106,7 @@ S: Supported
> F: include/linux/capability.h
> F: include/uapi/linux/capability.h
> F: kernel/capability.c
> +F: scripts/coccinelle/api/capable_order.cocci
> F: security/commoncap.c
>
> CAPELLA MICROSYSTEMS LIGHT SENSOR DRIVER
> diff --git a/scripts/coccinelle/api/capable_order.cocci b/scripts/coccinelle/api/capable_order.cocci
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4150d91b0f33
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/scripts/coccinelle/api/capable_order.cocci
> @@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> +///
> +/// Checks for capable() calls of the left side of a binary expression.
> +/// Reordering might avoid needless checks, LSM log messages, and more
> +/// restrictive LSM security policies (e.g. SELinux).
> +/// Can report false positives if the righthand side contains a nested
> +/// capability check or has side effects.
> +///
> +// Confidence: Moderate
> +// Copyright: (C) 2024 Christian Göttsche.
> +// Options: --no-includes --include-headers
> +// Keywords: capable, ns_capable, sockopt_ns_capable
> +//
> +
> +virtual patch
> +virtual context
> +virtual org
> +virtual report
> +
> +//----------------------------------------------------------
> +// Pattern to ignore
> +//----------------------------------------------------------
> +
> +@ignore@
> +identifier F1 = { capable, ns_capable, sockopt_ns_capable };
> +identifier F2 = { capable, ns_capable, sockopt_ns_capable };
> +binary operator op,op1,op2;
> +expression E;
> +position p;
> +@@
> +
> +(
> +F1@p(...) op F2(...)
> +|
> +E op1 F1@p(...) op2 F2(...)
> +)
> +
> +
> +//----------------------------------------------------------
> +// For patch mode
> +//----------------------------------------------------------
> +
> +@ depends on patch@
> +identifier F = { capable, ns_capable, sockopt_ns_capable };
> +binary operator op,op1,op2;
> +expression E,E1,E2;
> +expression list EL;
> +position p != ignore.p;
> +@@
> +
> +(
> +- F@p(EL) op E
> ++ E op F(EL)
> +|
> +- E1 op1 F@p(EL) op2 E2
> ++ E1 op1 E2 op2 F(EL)
> +)
> +
> +
> +//----------------------------------------------------------
> +// For context mode
> +//----------------------------------------------------------
> +
> +@r1 depends on !patch exists@
> +identifier F = { capable, ns_capable, sockopt_ns_capable };
> +binary operator op,op1,op2;
> +expression E, E1, E2;
> +position p != ignore.p;
> +@@
> +
> +(
> +* F@p(...) op E
> +|
> +* E1 op1 F@p(...) op2 E2
> +)
> +
> +
> +//----------------------------------------------------------
> +// For org mode
> +//----------------------------------------------------------
> +
> +@script:python depends on org@
> +p << r1.p;
> +@@
> +
> +cocci.print_main("WARNING opportunity for capable reordering",p)
> +
> +
> +//----------------------------------------------------------
> +// For report mode
> +//----------------------------------------------------------
> +
> +@script:python depends on report@
> +p << r1.p;
> +@@
> +
> +msg = "WARNING opportunity for capable reordering"
> +coccilib.report.print_report(p[0], msg)
> --
> 2.45.2
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-30 4:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-25 10:39 [PATCH 02/11] quota: reorder capability check last Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:39 ` [PATCH 03/11] ext4: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:39 ` [PATCH 04/11] hugetlbfs: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:39 ` [PATCH 05/11] genwqe: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:39 ` [PATCH 06/11] ubifs: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 11:10 ` Liviu Dudau
2024-11-25 11:30 ` Richard Weinberger
2024-11-25 11:48 ` Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:39 ` [PATCH 07/11] ipv4: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-26 8:01 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-11-25 10:40 ` [PATCH 08/11] gfs2: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 11:34 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2024-11-25 10:40 ` [PATCH 09/11] fs: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 12:17 ` Christian Brauner
2024-11-25 10:40 ` [PATCH 10/11] skbuff: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:40 ` [PATCH 11/11] infiniband: " Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 10:40 ` [PATCH 01/11] coccinelle: Add script to reorder capable() calls Christian Göttsche
2024-11-25 17:48 ` [cocci] " Markus Elfring
2024-11-26 12:55 ` Markus Elfring
2024-11-27 11:45 ` Markus Elfring
2024-11-29 12:38 ` Markus Elfring
2024-11-30 4:08 ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241130040842.GB65112@mail.hallyn.com \
--to=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=Julia.Lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=cgzones@googlemail.com \
--cc=cocci@inria.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.palix@imag.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox