Linux Security Modules development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
	casey.schaufler@intel.com, jmorris@namei.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org
Cc: keescook@chromium.org, penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp,
	paul@paul-moore.com, sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 25/25] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 11:03:16 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5902ad97-900d-8570-7c39-723f9c263ecb@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191113182506.2580-9-casey@schaufler-ca.com>

On 11/13/19 10:25 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> With the inclusion of the "display" process attribute
> mechanism AppArmor no longer needs to be treated as an
> "exclusive" security module. Remove the flag that indicates
> it is exclusive. Remove the stub getpeersec_dgram AppArmor
> hook as it has no effect in the single LSM case and
> interferes in the multiple LSM case.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
> Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>

Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>


> ---
>  security/apparmor/lsm.c | 20 +-------------------
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/apparmor/lsm.c b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> index b4c964fdc2f9..81bc4f773429 100644
> --- a/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> +++ b/security/apparmor/lsm.c
> @@ -1099,22 +1099,6 @@ static int apparmor_socket_getpeersec_stream(struct socket *sock, char **optval,
>  	return error;
>  }
>  
> -/**
> - * apparmor_socket_getpeersec_dgram - get security label of packet
> - * @sock: the peer socket
> - * @skb: packet data
> - * @secid: pointer to where to put the secid of the packet
> - *
> - * Sets the netlabel socket state on sk from parent
> - */
> -static int apparmor_socket_getpeersec_dgram(struct socket *sock,
> -					    struct sk_buff *skb, u32 *secid)
> -
> -{
> -	/* TODO: requires secid support */
> -	return -ENOPROTOOPT;
> -}
> -
>  /**
>   * apparmor_sock_graft - Initialize newly created socket
>   * @sk: child sock
> @@ -1218,8 +1202,6 @@ static struct security_hook_list apparmor_hooks[] __lsm_ro_after_init = {
>  #endif
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(socket_getpeersec_stream,
>  		      apparmor_socket_getpeersec_stream),
> -	LSM_HOOK_INIT(socket_getpeersec_dgram,
> -		      apparmor_socket_getpeersec_dgram),
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(sock_graft, apparmor_sock_graft),
>  #ifdef CONFIG_NETWORK_SECMARK
>  	LSM_HOOK_INIT(inet_conn_request, apparmor_inet_conn_request),
> @@ -1777,7 +1759,7 @@ static int __init apparmor_init(void)
>  
>  DEFINE_LSM(apparmor) = {
>  	.name = "apparmor",
> -	.flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR | LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE,
> +	.flags = LSM_FLAG_LEGACY_MAJOR,
>  	.enabled = &apparmor_enabled,
>  	.blobs = &apparmor_blob_sizes,
>  	.init = apparmor_init,
> 


      reply	other threads:[~2019-11-21 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20191113182506.2580-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2019-11-13 18:24 ` [PATCH v11 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 18:24   ` [PATCH v11 18/25] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 19:01     ` John Johansen
2019-11-21 20:36       ` James Morris
2019-11-13 18:25   ` [PATCH v11 19/25] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 19:02     ` John Johansen
2019-11-13 18:25   ` [PATCH v11 20/25] LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 18:25   ` [PATCH v11 21/25] Audit: Add subj_LSM fields when necessary Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 18:25   ` [PATCH v11 22/25] Audit: Include object data for all security modules Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 18:25   ` [PATCH v11 23/25] NET: Add SO_PEERCONTEXT for multiple LSMs Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 18:25   ` [PATCH v11 24/25] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 18:25   ` [PATCH v11 25/25] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 19:03     ` John Johansen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5902ad97-900d-8570-7c39-723f9c263ecb@canonical.com \
    --to=john.johansen@canonical.com \
    --cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox