From: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
To: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
casey.schaufler@intel.com, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
selinux@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org,
penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp, paul@paul-moore.com,
sds@tycho.nsa.gov
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 18/25] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 07:36:55 +1100 (AEDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.21.1911220734260.30841@namei.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2b3065d-c8b7-4d77-c447-5ae81ba9b27c@canonical.com>
On Thu, 21 Nov 2019, John Johansen wrote:
> On 11/13/19 10:24 AM, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> > Change netlink netfilter interfaces to use lsmcontext
> > pointers, and remove scaffolding.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> > Reviewed-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
> > cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
>
> Acked-by: John Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
Just to clarify, you don't need to ack if you've already added a
reviewed-by, I just want to make sure all of the patches have some kind of
signoff.
--
James Morris
<jmorris@namei.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-21 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20191113182506.2580-1-casey.ref@schaufler-ca.com>
2019-11-13 18:24 ` [PATCH v11 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 18:24 ` [PATCH v11 18/25] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 19:01 ` John Johansen
2019-11-21 20:36 ` James Morris [this message]
2019-11-13 18:25 ` [PATCH v11 19/25] NET: Store LSM netlabel data in a lsmblob Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 19:02 ` John Johansen
2019-11-13 18:25 ` [PATCH v11 20/25] LSM: Verify LSM display sanity in binder Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 18:25 ` [PATCH v11 21/25] Audit: Add subj_LSM fields when necessary Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 18:25 ` [PATCH v11 22/25] Audit: Include object data for all security modules Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 18:25 ` [PATCH v11 23/25] NET: Add SO_PEERCONTEXT for multiple LSMs Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 18:25 ` [PATCH v11 24/25] LSM: Add /proc attr entry for full LSM context Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 18:25 ` [PATCH v11 25/25] AppArmor: Remove the exclusive flag Casey Schaufler
2019-11-21 19:03 ` John Johansen
2019-11-13 17:56 [PATCH v11 00/25] LSM: Module stacking for AppArmor Casey Schaufler
2019-11-13 17:57 ` [PATCH v11 18/25] LSM: security_secid_to_secctx in netlink netfilter Casey Schaufler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LRH.2.21.1911220734260.30841@namei.org \
--to=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=casey.schaufler@intel.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=john.johansen@canonical.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox