From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suze.cz, djwong@kernel.org,
hch@lst.de, serge@hallyn.com,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Introduce capable_noaudit
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2026 10:35:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <akYimPrAcHlv7shR@nidhogg.toxiclabs.cc> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702-alufelgen-belag-tastatur-b666a49f7fc0@brauner>
On Thu, Jul 02, 2026 at 09:41:39AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On 2026-06-26 13:45 +0200, cem@kernel.org wrote:
> > From: Carlos Maiolino <cem@kernel.org>
> >
> > In some cases - filesystems quota specifically here - we'd like to check
> > for effective capabilities without issuing spurious audit messages and
> > without the need to specify a namespace for that.
> >
> > This series introduce capable_noaudit() which has the same goal as
> > capable() but without firing audit messages.
> >
> > Also, this updates both generic quota and xfs quota code to use that.
> >
> > The last patch unexports has_capability_noaudit() which was originally
> > exported to be used in xfs but turns out it does not meet our needs.
> >
> > Note this is based on top of a current series I have to remove
> > has_capability_noaudit() calls from xfs so the xfs patch won't
> > apply cleanly without that series.
> >
> > If adding this helper is acceptable, I'll turn this into a non-rfc
> > series with the required changes to apply properly.
> >
> > Comments? Flames?
>
> Convert more, please.
>
Convert what? :) more callers from capable() to capable_noaudit()?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-02 8:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-26 11:45 [RFC PATCH 0/4] Introduce capable_noaudit cem
2026-06-26 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] capabily: Add new capable_noaudit cem
2026-06-26 15:16 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-26 15:31 ` Paul Moore
2026-06-26 17:46 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2026-06-29 12:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-29 13:49 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2026-07-02 7:53 ` Carlos Maiolino
2026-06-26 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] quota: Don't issue audit messages on quota enforcing cem
2026-06-26 15:18 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-29 12:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-26 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] xfs: replace ns_capable_noaudit() cem
2026-06-26 15:19 ` Darrick J. Wong
2026-06-29 12:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-29 12:30 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-26 11:45 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] capability: unexport has_capability_noaudit cem
2026-06-29 12:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
[not found] ` <20260626152008.GW6078@frogsfrogsfrogs>
2026-06-29 12:31 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-02 7:41 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] Introduce capable_noaudit Christian Brauner
2026-07-02 8:35 ` Carlos Maiolino [this message]
2026-07-02 13:47 ` Christian Brauner
2026-07-02 14:51 ` Carlos Maiolino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=akYimPrAcHlv7shR@nidhogg.toxiclabs.cc \
--to=cem@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=djwong@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jack@suze.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox