From: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jirislaby@kernel.org,
ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com
Cc: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, shawnguo@kernel.org,
s.hauer@pengutronix.de, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,
alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org,
LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de, lukas@wunner.de, p.rosenberger@kunbus.com,
Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/7] serial: core: fix sanitizing check for RTS settings
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2023 19:48:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231018174840.28977-4-l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231018174840.28977-1-l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>
Among other things uart_sanitize_serial_rs485() tests the sanity of the RTS
settings in a RS485 configuration that has been passed by userspace.
If RTS-on-send and RTS-after-send are both set or unset the configuration
is adjusted and RTS-after-send is disabled and RTS-on-send enabled.
This however makes only sense if both RTS modes are actually supported by
the driver.
With commit be2e2cb1d281 ("serial: Sanitize rs485_struct") the code does
take the driver support into account but only checks if one of both RTS
modes are supported. This may lead to the errorneous result of RTS-on-send
being set even if only RTS-after-send is supported.
Fix this by changing the implemented logic: First clear all unsupported
flags in the RS485 configuration, then adjust an invalid RTS setting by
taking into account which RTS mode is supported.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: be2e2cb1d281 ("serial: Sanitize rs485_struct")
Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>
---
drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
index ef9e9014bfab..f1d889f9fd6e 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/serial/serial_core.c
@@ -1370,19 +1370,27 @@ static void uart_sanitize_serial_rs485(struct uart_port *port, struct serial_rs4
return;
}
+ rs485->flags &= supported_flags;
+
/* Pick sane settings if the user hasn't */
- if ((supported_flags & (SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND|SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND)) &&
- !(rs485->flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND) ==
+ if (!(rs485->flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND) ==
!(rs485->flags & SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND)) {
- dev_warn_ratelimited(port->dev,
- "%s (%d): invalid RTS setting, using RTS_ON_SEND instead\n",
- port->name, port->line);
- rs485->flags |= SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND;
- rs485->flags &= ~SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND;
- supported_flags |= SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND|SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND;
- }
+ if (supported_flags & SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND) {
+ rs485->flags |= SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND;
+ rs485->flags &= ~SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND;
- rs485->flags &= supported_flags;
+ dev_warn_ratelimited(port->dev,
+ "%s (%d): invalid RTS setting, using RTS_ON_SEND instead\n",
+ port->name, port->line);
+ } else {
+ rs485->flags |= SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND;
+ rs485->flags &= ~SER_RS485_RTS_ON_SEND;
+
+ dev_warn_ratelimited(port->dev,
+ "%s (%d): invalid RTS setting, using RTS_AFTER_SEND instead\n",
+ port->name, port->line);
+ }
+ }
uart_sanitize_serial_rs485_delays(port, rs485);
--
2.40.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-18 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-18 17:48 [PATCH v4 0/7] Fixes and improvements for RS485 Lino Sanfilippo
2023-10-18 17:48 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] serial: Do not hold the port lock when setting rx-during-tx GPIO Lino Sanfilippo
2023-10-18 17:48 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] serial: core: set missing supported flag for RX during TX GPIO Lino Sanfilippo
2023-10-18 17:48 ` Lino Sanfilippo [this message]
2023-10-18 17:48 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] serial: core: make sure RS485 cannot be enabled when it is not supported Lino Sanfilippo
2023-10-18 17:48 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] serial: core, imx: do not set RS485 enabled if " Lino Sanfilippo
2023-10-18 17:48 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] serial: omap: do not override settings for RS485 support Lino Sanfilippo
2023-10-18 17:48 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] serial: 8250_exar: Set missing rs485_supported flag Lino Sanfilippo
2023-10-27 11:03 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] Fixes and improvements for RS485 Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231018174840.28977-4-l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com \
--to=l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com \
--cc=LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=p.rosenberger@kunbus.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox